Cotton Ginning Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: ENHANCING QUALITY, UTILITY, SUSTAINABILITY, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF COTTON AND ITS BYPRODUCTS THROUGH IMPROVEMENT IN HARVEST/GIN PROCESSING

Location: Cotton Ginning Research

Title: Cotton thermal defoliation economics

Authors
item Funk, Paul
item Armijo, Carlos
item Hawkes, Gerry -
item Libben, James -

Submitted to: Journal of American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: November 20, 2011
Publication Date: June 13, 2012
Citation: Funk, P.A., Armijo, C.B., Hawkes, G.M., Libben, J.D. 2012. Cotton thermal defoliation economics. Journal of American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. 75(1):29-42.

Interpretive Summary: Cotton harvest-aid chemical costs and application expenses are justified by increased quantity and value of harvested fiber, and decreased harvest costs. Chemical use is restricted in certain production situations, and may be taxed or further curtailed in the future. Thermal defoliation is an effective alternative to conventional chemical harvest preparation, but it may cost twice as much per acre. Thermal defoliation (organic) and chemical harvest aids (conventional) Pima cotton were compared using a crop cost and return estimator. A positive return to land and risk can be obtained for organic Pima if yields are greater than 600 pounds per acre and prices are over $1.79 per pound; with conventional production, where yields may be above 750 pounds per acre, a positive return can be realized with prices above $1.20 per pound. Thermal defoliation allows early harvest without the chemicals deemed necessary to produce a high-quality conventional crop, but a price premium is necessary to make it viable.

Technical Abstract: Cotton harvest-aid chemical and application expenses are justified by increased quantity and value of harvested fiber, and decreased harvest costs. Chemical use may be restricted in certain production situations. Harvest preparation costs and producer returns were compared for thermal defoliation in organic and chemical harvest aids in conventional Pima cotton using a crop cost and return estimator. A positive return to land and risk can be reached for organic Pima with yields greater than 600 pounds per acre and prices over $1.79 per pound. Thermal defoliation allows early harvest without the chemicals deemed necessary to produce a high-quality conventional crop.

   

 
Project Team
Whitelock, Derek
Armijo, Carlos
Baker, Kevin
Funk, Paul
Hughs, Sidney - Hughs Ed
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products (306)
  Climate Change, Soils, and Emissions (212)
 
Related Projects
   USING CONVEYING AIR TEMPERATURE TO PREDICT SEED COTTON MOISTURE CONTENT
   DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETITIVE HIGH QUALITY AND ACALA 1517 COTTON THROUGH ENHANCED GINNING/TEXTILE PROCESSING PERFORMANCE
   DIFFERENTIAL ROLLER GINNING OF UPLAND COTTON
   EXAMINING GIN STANDS AND LINT CLEANERS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF UPLAND COTTON
   INVESTIGATING SEED COTTON RECLAIMERS TO IMPROVE THE PRODUCTIVITY OF ROLLER GINNING PLANTS
   Removing Seed Coat Fragments During Lint Cleaning
 
 
Last Modified: 05/20/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House