Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: MANAGING FORAGE AND GRAZING LANDS FOR MULTIPLE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Location: Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research

Title: Implementation of grassland conservation practices in EQIP

Authors
item Griffin, Tim -
item Soder, Kathy
item Sanderson, Matt

Submitted to: ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: September 1, 2010
Publication Date: October 30, 2010
Citation: Griffin, T., Soder, K.J., Sanderson, M.A. 2010. Implementation of grassland conservation practices in EQIP. ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts. p. 1.

Interpretive Summary: An interpretive summary is not required.

Technical Abstract: Many conservation practices are implemented with financial and technical assistance from the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), administered by the USDA. The extent to which practices specific to grasslands and pasture-based production systems have been adopted is not clear. We used contract-level administrative data from EQIP for the eastern U.S. (roughly, east of the Missouri River) to assess the physical footprint and financial expenditure for conservation practices associated with grasslands and unconfined animal production systems, including fencing, grazing and harvest management, and restriction of animal access. These practices represent a relatively small proportion of total EQIP spending from 2004 to 2008, but encompass more than 100,000 individual contracts. EQIP funds that were identifiable by livestock class (e.g., beef, dairy, etc.) and which were potentially associated with grassland systems totaled nearly $340 million. Some practices supported by EQIP are clearly associated with grasslands, like prescribed grazing and livestock exclusion, while other are more ambiguous, like nutrient management. For most standard practices, the expenditures from EQIP were overwhelmingly (75-97%) associated with beef production. Prescribed grazing and forage crop establishment, two of the most common practices, were implemented on more than 3 million acres.

   

 
Project Team
Skinner, Robert - Howard
Soder, Kathy
Goslee, Sarah
Adler, Paul
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Bioenergy (213)
  Food Animal Production (101)
  Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems (215)
 
Related Projects
   PASTURELAND CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT LITERATURE SYNTHESEIS
   CONSERVATION PRACTICES IN NORTHEASTERN GRAZING LANDS
   U.S. NATIVE GRASS BREEDING CONSORTIUM TO IDENTIFY REGIONAL OPTIMUM BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY ON MARGINAL LAND
   MECHANISTIC MODELING OF MULTISPECIES PASTURE GROWTH AND MANAGEMENT
   INTEGRATED PASTURE-CROP ROTATION
   GRAZINGLAND CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT
   GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND NITRATE LOSSES FROM ORGANIC SOILS IN DAIRY FARMING SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN GERMANY
   REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF BIOFUEL AND FORAGE SPECIES
   IMPACT OF CONSERVATION PRACTICES ON NUTRIENT TRANSPORT AND FATE IN PASTURE SYSTEMS
   REGIONAL CORN STOVER REMOVAL IMPACT STUDY - AMES (II)
   ASSISTING ORGANIC DAIRY PRODUCERS TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF NEW AND EMERGING MILK MARKETS
   GRAZING LANDS CEAP
   GREENHOUSE GAS LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BIOCHAR EFFECTS ON MARGINAL LAND CONVERSION TO SWITCHGRASS PRODUCTION
 
 
Last Modified: 05/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House