Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Agroforestry Research
Bioenergy Potential for Small Farms
Farm Sustainability
Sheep & Goat Production for Small Farms
Subsurface Application of Poultry Litter
 

Research Project: ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS FROM MULTIUSE AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES TO FAMILY FARMS

Location: Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center

Title: Bioethanol production from dedicated energy crops and residues in Arkansas, USA

Authors
item Ge, Xumeng -
item Xu, Jianfeng -
item Phillips, Gregory -
item Sivakumar, Ganapathy -
item Burner, David

Submitted to: Journal of Biotechnology
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: October 10, 2010
Publication Date: January 1, 2011
Citation: Ge, X., Xu, J., Phillips, G.C., Sivakumar, G., Burner, D.M. 2011. Bioethanol production from dedicated energy crops and residues in Arkansas, USA. Biotechnology Journal. 6(1):66-73.

Interpretive Summary: There is great urgency for developing biofuels, such as bioethanol, that are both renewable and environmentally friendly. Raw materials constitute about 60% of the production cost for bioethanol. The low cost and huge potential availability of lignocellulosic biomass such as agricultural residues, forestry wastes, waste paper, and energy crops make them particularly attractive biofuel commodities for the MidSouth/Mississippi Delta region, including Arkansas. However, a cost-effective method for converting lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol is a major technological impediment. Lignocellulose pre-treatment significantly influences the costs of upstream (e.g., lignocellulose particle size reduction) and downstream operations (e.g., enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation). Our objectives were to test a cost-effective cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation (CSLF) pretreatment and enzymatic (cellulase) hydrolysis method to convert lignocellulose to reactive cellulosic intermediates and hydrolyze reactive intermediates to fermentable sugars, and develop ethanol fermentation methodologies with a self-flocculating yeast strain to reduce downstream process costs. Glucose yield of five dedicated energy crops and two crops residues ranged from 0.167 g/g (rice husk) to 0.295 g/g (giant miscanthus clone Q42641). A self-flocculating yeast strain (SPSC01) was used to ferment the lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates. These methods may be useful for developing a cost effective downstream process for bioethanol production.

Technical Abstract: Globally, one of the major technological goals is cost-effective lignocellulosic ethanol production from biomass feedstocks. Lignocellulosic biomass of five dedicated energy crops and two crops residues were tested for bioethanol production using cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation (CSLF) pretreatment and enzymatic (Cellulase) hydrolysis: Miscanthus x giganteus from Illinois, Arkansas-grown giant reed, bical miscanthus and elephant grass, which yielded the most glucose based on biomass dry weight (0.291 - 0.295 g g–1), followed by Arkansas-grown sugar cane (0.264 g g–1), soybean (0.184 g g–1), and rice husk (0.167 g g–1). In order to reduce the capital investment for energy consumption in fermentation, the self-flocculating yeast strain was used to ferment the aforementioned lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates. The bioethanol production was approximately 0.1g g-l in dedicated energy crops and lower in crops residues such as rice husk and soy beans. These methods and data may be useful for developing a cost effective downstream process for bioethanol production.

   

 
Project Team
Burner, David
Pote, Daniel - Dan
Donoghue, Ann - Annie
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Agricultural System Competitiveness and Sustainability (216)
 
 
Last Modified: 05/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House