Sugarbeet and Potato Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: IMPROVING POTATO MARKET QUALITY THROUGHT POSTHARVEST PHYSIOLOGY

Location: Sugarbeet and Potato Research

Title: The Sprout Inhibitors Chlorpropham and 1, 4-dimethynaphthalene Alter Transcript Levels for KIP1 and KIP2

Authors
item Gleichsner, Alyssa -
item Hilldorfer, Lindsay -
item Campbell, Michael -
item Suttle, Jeffrey

Submitted to: Meeting Abstract
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: May 3, 2010
Publication Date: August 9, 2010
Citation: Gleichsner, A., Hilldorfer, L., Campbell, M.A., Suttle, J.C. 2010. The Sprout Inhibitors Chlorpropham and 1, 4-dimethynaphthalene Alter Transcript Levels for KIP1 and KIP2 [abstract.] Plant Biology 2010 Abstracts. P08062. Available: http://abstracts.aspb.org/pb2010/public/P08/P08062.html.

Technical Abstract: Chlorpropham (CIPC) and 1, 4-dimethylnaphthalene (DMN) are two inhibitors used to prevent sprouting in potatoes. CIPC is a synthetic compound which disrupts potato microtubules, preventing spindle formation. DMN is a natural compound isolated from potatoes whose pathway of action is currently unknown. To determine the effect of these treatments on cell division, a selection of genes, which induce or repress the cell cycle, were selected for analysis using Quantitative RealTime PCR (QT-PCR). cDNA was synthesized from RNA isolated from CIPC-treated, DMN-treated, and nondormant potato meristem tissue. QT-PCR tests were run using a StepOneTM Real Time PCR system and results were analyzed with Step One Software v2.0 to determine CT values on a log10 scale using alpha EF1 as a reference. It was found that CIPC treatment resulted in down-regulation of the KIP1 and KIP2 genes which are repressors of cell cycle activity. This is thought to be a response to the build-up of cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle following treatment with CIPC. Results for DMN were inconclusive but showed up-regulation of both KIP genes, further emphasizing the differences between the two treatments and the manner by which they act to inhibit sprouting.

   

 
Project Team
Suttle, Jeffrey
Lulai, Edward
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Plant Biological and Molecular Processes (302)
  Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products (306)
 
 
Last Modified: 05/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House