Cotton Ginning Laboratory(Stoneville, MS) Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Research Areas
Controlling the Ginning Process
 

Research Project: DEVELOP, ENHANCE AND TRANSFER GIN TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE FIBER QUALITY AND PROFITS

Location: Cotton Ginning Laboratory(Stoneville, MS)

Title: Effect of Mechanical Actions on Cotton Fiber Quality and Foreign-Matter Particle Attachment to Cotton Fibers

Authors
item Sui, Ruixiu
item Thomasson, J. -
item Byler, Richard
item Boykin, J
item Barnes, Edward -

Submitted to: National Cotton Council Beltwide Cotton Conference
Publication Type: Proceedings
Publication Acceptance Date: January 15, 2010
Publication Date: April 30, 2010
Repository URL: http:////www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2005-2010/data/conferences/2010/papers/10681.pdf#page=1
Citation: Sui, R., Thomasson, J.A., Byler, R.K., Boykin Jr, J.C., Barnes, E.M. 2010. Effect of Mechanical Actions on Cotton Fiber Quality and Foreign-Matter Particle Attachment to Cotton Fibers. National Cotton Council Beltwide Cotton Conference. CD ROM p. 586-595.

Interpretive Summary: U.S. Cotton is mechanically harvested. Machine-harvested cotton contains about 13 to 35% foreign matter including plant leaves, bract, stick, stem, seed-coat fragment, shale, grass, etc. It is desirable for as much foreign matter as possible to be removed from cotton with minimal fiber damage at gin. In general, current seed-cotton and lint cleaning equipment used at the gin are capable in removing non-lint material from cotton. However, it is also widely realized that they damage the fiber. To develop new and less damaging methods for removing foreign-matter particles from cotton fiber, effects of various machine-fiber interactions during harvesting and ginning on fiber quality and attachment between foreign-matter particles and fibers were studied. Cotton samples were collected with five different harvesting and processing treatments: (1) hand-picked and hand-ginned, (2) machine-picked and hand-ginned, (3) machine-picked, seed-cotton-cleaned, and hand-ginned, (4) machine-picked, seed-cotton-cleaned, and machine-ginned, and (5) machine-picked, seed-cotton-cleaned, machine-ginned, and one-stage lint-cleaned. A microscope was used to identify foreign-matter particles in each sample. Physical characteristics of the particles and their attachment to fibers were investigated and classified. All samples were analyzed with standard cotton quality measurement instruments, HVI and AFIS. Data were processed using statistical analysis software, SAS. Results indicated that each machine-fiber interaction during the harvesting and ginning process decreased the size of foreign-matter particles. The particles had no obvious difference in shape across the processing stages. The tightness of particle-fiber attachment, the number of neps, and the short fiber content tended to increase as the number of mechanical interactions increased. The gin stand was a major contributor to the increase in short fiber content. The majority of the foreign-matter particles was leaves. However, the particle categories changed with stages of processing. The proportion of leaf particle decreased and the proportion of the seed-coat fragment and stem increased with an increasing number of mechanical interactions. This study developed a fundamental understanding of the effect of mechanical interactions on physical characteristics of the foreign-matter particles, the particle-fiber attachment, and the fiber quality. The results are useful in developing new methods to remove non-lint material from cotton with less damage of the fiber.

Technical Abstract: The effects of various machine-fiber interactions during harvesting and ginning on fiber quality and attachment between foreign-matter particles and fibers were studied to develop new and less damaging methods for removing foreign-matter particles from cotton fiber. In total, the study involved 75 samples collected from five locations in a field near College Station, Texas, including three replications and five different harvesting and processing treatments: (1) hand-picked and hand-ginned, (2) machine-picked and hand-ginned, (3) machine-picked, seed-cotton-cleaned, and hand-ginned, (4) machine-picked, seed-cotton-cleaned, and machine-ginned, and (5) machine-picked, seed-cotton-cleaned, machine-ginned, and one-stage lint-cleaned. A microscope was used to identify foreign-matter particles in each sample. Physical characteristics of the particles and their attachment to fibers were investigated and classified. All samples were analyzed with HVI and AFIS. Data of the particle classification, HVI, and AFIS were statistically processed with SAS. Results indicated that each machine-fiber interaction during the harvesting and ginning process had the net effect of decreasing the size of foreign-matter particles. The particles had no obvious difference in shape across the processing stages. The tightness of particle-fiber attachment, the number of neps, and the short fiber content differed significantly as a function of mechanical actions; they all tended to increase as the number of mechanical actions increased. As expected, the gin stand was a major contributor to the increase in short fiber content. The majority of the foreign-matter particles were leaves, but proportions of the particle categories changed with stages of processing. The proportion of leaf particles decreased, while the proportion of seed-coat fragments and stems increased, with an increasing number of mechanical actions.

   

 
Project Team
Byler, Richard - Rick
Boykin, J - Clif
Sui, Ruixiu
Hardin, Robert - Bobby
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products (306)
 
 
Last Modified: 05/24/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House