Range Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Ecological Site Descriptions
Monitoring & Assessment
Long Term Ecological Research
Long Term Agricultural Research
Landscape Toolbox
Data Catalogs
EcoTrends
 

Research Project: MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR ARID RANGELANDS

Location: Range Management Research

Title: Threshold models in restoration – can we ever predict threshold responses?

Author

Submitted to: Society for Ecological Restoration Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: June 25, 2009
Publication Date: August 23, 2009
Citation: Bestelmeyer, B.T. 2009. Threshold models in restoration – can we ever predict threshold responses [abstract]. 19th Conference of Society for Ecological Restoration International, August 23-27, 2009, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. http://www.seri2009.com.au/pages/Wednesday_am.pdf.

Technical Abstract: Land managers and scientists often ask: “How do I identify the threshold?” or “Where is the threshold?” Such questions presume a great deal about the nature of thresholds that are, as yet, not generally understood and not necessarily general at all. In this talk, I review how the threshold concept has been considered in land management and argue five points. 1) Attempting to predict threshold responses is likely to be a waste of time in many cases. 2) We have not yet produced an adequate number of case histories about the consequences, scales, rates, and mechanisms of threshold behavior within different kinds of ecosystems, so it is difficult to structure monitoring programs to detect threshold responses. 3) Managing for resilient conditions, with attention to slow social and ecological variables, to minimize the risk of crossing a threshold is potentially useful but is controversial for managers. 4) We have a dim understanding of how inherent (i.e., not management-related) variations in landscapes influence threshold responses, but such understanding can be used to guide planning. 5) Recognizing the consequences of post-threshold states for restoration actions is the most straightforward use of the threshold concept at present. Examples are drawn from restoration approaches in the southwestern United States and elsewhere to support these assertions.

   

 
Project Team
Estell, Richard - Rick
Lucero, Mary
Peters, Debra - Deb
Havstad, Kris
Rango, Albert - Al
Herrick, Jeffrey - Jeff
Anderson, Dean
Bestelmeyer, Brandon
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems (215)
 
 
Last Modified: 05/25/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House