Range Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Ecological Site Descriptions
Monitoring & Assessment
Long Term Ecological Research
Long Term Agricultural Research
Landscape Toolbox
Data Catalogs
EcoTrends
 

Research Project: MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR ARID RANGELANDS

Location: Range Management Research

Title: Threshold models linked to land classification and indicators as guides to restoration – prospects and pitfalls

Authors
item Bestelmeyer, Brandon
item Herrick, Jeffrey
item Briske, David -
item Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria -
item Wu, X Ben -
item Brown, Joel -
item Havstad, Kris

Submitted to: Ecology Symposium
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: July 1, 2009
Publication Date: August 16, 2009
Citation: Bestelmeyer, B.T., Herrick, J.E., Briske, D.D., Fernandez-Gimenez, M., Wu, X., Brown, J., Havstad, K.M. 2009. Threshold models linked to land classification and indicators as guides to restoration – prospects and pitfalls [abstract]. 10th International Congress of Ecology: Ecology in a Changing Climate, August 16-19, 2009, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Technical Abstract: Threshold (or regime shift) models are useful for restoration because they match actions to conditions where benefits are likely to be maximized. The procedures by which threshold models should be applied, however, are in the early stages of development. Here, we describe ecological concepts and derivative elements of an approach to applying threshold models including 1) combining experiments, simulations, and local ecological knowledge to develop conceptual state-and-transition models representing specific geographic areas; 2) linking the models to soil, plant, and landscape process-based indicators detected in ground-based or remotely-sensed assessment; 3) recognizing model contingency with respect to varying land-use, soils and geomorphology, and climate; and 4) cooperative planning of restoration actions integrated with model-based experimentation and monitoring. We describe several tools that have been used for each element and limitations of the tools and concepts revealed in applications in the United States and Mongolia. We suggest that the integration of threshold/resilience concepts with scale-specific models, process-based indicators, spatial data on the biophysical and social environment, and restoration experiments is becoming an increasingly common solution to connecting abstract ideas with real-world restoration applications.

   

 
Project Team
Estell, Richard - Rick
Lucero, Mary
Peters, Debra - Deb
Havstad, Kris
Rango, Albert - Al
Herrick, Jeffrey - Jeff
Anderson, Dean
Bestelmeyer, Brandon
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems (215)
 
 
Last Modified: 05/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House