Animal Waste Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Research Information for Stakeholders
 

Research Project: EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT AND USE OF ANIMAL MANURE TO PROTECT HUMAN HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Location: Animal Waste Management Research

Title: Greenhouse gas emissions from swine effluent applied to soil by different methods.

Authors
item Sistani, Karamat
item Warren, Jason - OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
item Lovanh, Nanh
item Higgins, S - UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
item Shearer, S - UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY

Submitted to: Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: May 21, 2009
Publication Date: January 8, 2010
Repository URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/41302
Citation: Sistani, K.R., Warren, J., Lovanh, N.C., Higgins, S., Shearer, S. 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions from swine effluent applied to soil by different methods. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 74:429-435.

Interpretive Summary: A field experiment evaluating pre-plant swine effluent application methods was conducted to measure greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, and N2O) emissions from a no-till corn grain production. The treatments included a control, an inorganic fertilizer treatment receiving 179 kg N ha-1 as urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), and three effluent application methods that received a target rate of 200 kg N ha-1. The effluent treatments included: surface application, direct injection, and application in combination with soil aeration. Gas emission measurements were initiated after application and collected throughout the 2007 and 2008 growing seasons using a vented chamber technique. There were no significant differences in CO2 losses, which averaged 738 and 718 g CO2 m-2 in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Placement of effluent below the soil surface by injection or aeration resulted in elevated CH4 emission compared to the control. Injection method consistently emitted the largest amount of CH4 with emissions of 0.26 and 0.80 g CH4 m-2, in 2007 and 2008, respectively. In 2007, N2O emissions were similar for the UAN, surface effluent, and aeration effluent treatments; emitting an average of 0.72, g N2O m-2. In contrast, the injection treatment emitted 0.47 g N2O m-2. In 2008, this trend was reversed with the injection treatment emitting 0.82 g N2O m-2 and the remaining N source treatments emitting an average of 0.36 g N2O m-2. These differences between years likely resulted from differences in rainfall distribution. These results demonstrate that climatic conditions and application method need consideration when evaluating the impact of liquid manure management on greenhouse gas emissions.

Technical Abstract: Greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, and N2O) emissions were measured from a field experiment evaluating pre-plant swine effluent application methods for no-till corn grain production. The treatments included a control, an inorganic fertilizer treatment receiving 179 kg N ha-1 as urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), and three effluent application methods that received a target rate of 200 kg N ha-1. The effluent treatments included: surface application, direct injection, and application in combination with soil aeration. Gas emission measurements were initiated after application and collected throughout the 2007 and 2008 growing seasons using a vented chamber technique. There were no significant differences in CO2 losses, which averaged 738 and 718 g CO2 m-2 in 2007 and 2008, respectively. Placement of effluent below the soil surface by injection or aeration resulted in elevated CH4 emission compared to the control. Injection consistently emitted the largest amount of CH4 with emissions of 0.26 and 0.80 g CH4 m-2, in 2007 and 2008, respectively. In 2007, N2O emissions were similar for the UAN, surface effluent, and aeration effluent treatments; emitting an average of 0.72, g N2O m-2. In contrast, the injection treatment emitted 0.47 g N2O m-2. In 2008, this trend was reversed with the injection treatment emitting 0.82 g N2O m-2 and the remaining N source treatments emitting an average of 0.36 g N2O m-2. These differences between years likely resulted from differences in rainfall distribution. These results demonstrate that climatic conditions and application method need consideration when evaluating the impact of liquid manure management on greenhouse gas emissions.

   

 
Project Team
Sistani, Karamat
Loughrin, John
Bolster, Carl
Cook, Kimberly - Kim
Lovanh, Nanh
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Air Quality (203)
  Manure and Byproduct Utilization (206)
  Food Safety, (animal and plant products) (108)
 
 
Last Modified: 05/20/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House