Nutrition Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: IMPROVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT AND EFFICIENCY IN CATTLE

Location: Nutrition Research

Title: Comparison of Two Protocols to Achieve Pregnancy to Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination (TAI) in Suckled Beef Cows

Authors
item Echternkamp, Sherrill
item Hays, William - USMARC/UNL, CLAY CENTER
item Jones, Shuna
item Cushman, Robert

Submitted to: Journal of Animal Science Supplement
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: February 19, 2009
Publication Date: July 1, 2009
Citation: Echternkamp, S.E., Hays, W.G., Jones, S., Cushman, R.A. 2009. Comparison of Two Protocols to Achieve Pregnancy to Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination (TAI) in Suckled Beef Cows [abstract]. Journal of Animal Science. 87 (E-Supplement 2):269 (Abstract # T228).

Technical Abstract: Application of AI in extensive beef cattle production has been limited by the necessity to monitor estrus and handle animals twice daily for several weeks. Protocols that proficiently synchronize ovarian follicular development and ovulation to enable fixed-time artificial insemination (TAI) would facilitate use of AI. The objective was to determine whether adding a controlled internal drug-release device (CIDR) to a GnRH-based protocol increased blood progesterone (P4) concentrations and ovarian synchrony, thus increasing pregnancy rate to TAI. Cyclic suckled beef cows (n = 1238) received 1 of 2 treatments: 1) an injection of GnRH (100 µg i.m.) followed by 25 mg PGF2 (PGF) i.m. 7 d later, followed by GnRH (100 µg i.m.) 60 h after PGF (CO-Synch), or 2) Co-Synch plus a CIDR during the 7-d interval between GnRH and PGF injections (Co-Synch + CIDR). All cows were bred by TAI 60 h after PGF. Cows were fitted with an Estrotect heat detector and estrus was recorded during treatment and at TAI. Blood samples were collected at GnRH (first) and PGF injections; P4 was assayed in plasma by RIA. Pregnancy was diagnosed 70 to 90 d after AI. Progesterone did not differ between treatments at first GnRH (4.0 + 0.1 ng/mL) but was greater (P < 0.01) at PGF injection in Co-Synch + CIDR- vs. Co-Synch-treated cows (4.6 vs. 3.5 + 0.1 ng/mL, respectively), and fewer CIDR-treated cows had P4 concentrations < 1 ng/mL at PGF (10.7 vs. 28.4 + 1.0%, respectively). A greater (P < 0.01) percentage of Co-Synch + CIDR- vs. Co-Synch-treated cows expressed estrus (63.4 vs. 54.4 + 2.0%) and were pregnant to TAI (53.5 vs. 43.2 + 2.0%, respectively). For cows having P4 < 1 ng/mL at PGF, the CIDR increased pregnancy rate (59.1 vs. 27.6 + 2.0% with vs. without CIDR), whereas pregnancy rates did not differ between treatments for cows with P4 >1 ng/mL. Inclusion of a CIDR in the synchronization protocol increased plasma P4 concentrations, expression of estrus, and pregnancy rates, primarily in cows with low endogenous progesterone secretion.

   

 
Project Team
Freetly, Harvey
Cushman, Robert - Bob
Rohrer, Gary
McDaneld, Tara
Lindholm-Perry, Amanda
Hales, Kristin
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Food Animal Production (101)
 
 
Last Modified: 05/23/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House