Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
 
National Programs
International Programs
Find Research Projects
The Research Enterprise
Office of Scientific Quality Review
Research Initiatives
 

Research Project: QUANTIFYING LANDSCAPE FACTORS INFLUENCING SOIL PRODUCTIVITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT Title: Accounting for green vegetation and soil spectral properties to improve remote sensing of crop residue cover

Authors

Submitted to: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Proceedings
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: October 15, 2008
Publication Date: March 9, 2008
Citation: Serbin, G., Daughtry, C.S., Hunt, E.R., McCarty, G.W., Doraiswamy, P.C. 2008. Accounting for green vegetation and soil spectral properties to improve remote sensing of crop residue cover [abstract]. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Proceedings. 2008 CDROM.

Technical Abstract: Conservation tillage methods are beneficial as they disturb soil less and leaves increased crop residue cover (CRC) after planting on the soil surface. CRC helps reduce soil erosion, evaporation, and the need for tillage operations in fields. Greenhouse gas emissions are reduced to due to less fossil fuel usage by farm machinery. Also, the increased humification of crop residues help sequester carbon to the soil. As farmers can sell carbon credits and receive government incentives for instituting conservation tillage methods, an efficient verification method is needed. Optical remote sensing from satellite and aircraft allows for estimation of CRC in an efficient manner compared with traditional surface-based methods. CRC estimation in the U.S. Corn Belt was found to be most effective when utilizing multi- and hyperspectral sensors that include bands between 2000-2500 nm. The Cellulose Absorption Index (CAI) was the most effective index under all circumstances, as it specifically targets an absorption at 2101 nm unique to dry cellulose and other sugars but not soil minerals or green vegetation (GV). The Landsat TM based index Normalized Difference Tillage Index (NDTI) was not as effective, but could be used under limited circumstances. The presence of green vegetation significantly decreased the accuracy of NDTI, but the use of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in conjunction provides ability to exclude high GV pixels and to help improve sub-pixel classifications for low GV pixels. Accuracies were also improved when accounting for soil spectral properties when calculation calibration lines for NDVI and NDTI.

   

 
Project Team
Gish, Timothy
Daughtry, Craig
Sadeghi, Ali
Hunt, Earle - Ray
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Water Availability and Water Management (211)
  Soil Resource Management (202)
 
 
Last Modified: 06/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House