DEVELOP AND IMPROVE STRATEGIES FOR MANAGEMENT OF IRRIGATED AGRICULTURAL CROPS AND SOILS
Location: Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research
Title: Yield response of corn to deficit irrigation in a semiarid climate
| Payero, Jose - UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA |
| Melvin, Steven - UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA |
| Irmak, Suat - UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA |
Submitted to: Agricultural Water Management
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: January 23, 2006
Publication Date: March 9, 2006
Citation: Payero, J.O., Melvin, S.R., Irmak, S., Tarkalson, D.D. 2006. Yield response of corn to deficit irrigation in a semiarid climate. Agricultural Water Management. 84:101-112.
Interpretive Summary: Irrigation water supplies are decreasing in many areas of the US Great Plains, which is requiring many farmers to consider deficit-irrigating corn. This study was conducted in North Platte, NE to quantify the yield response of corn to deficit irrigation, and determine which of several seasonal water variables related best to corn yield in a semiarid climate. Water variables included, irrigation, total water, rain + irrigation, evaporation, crop evapotranspiration, and crop transpiration. Corn grain yield increased linearly with seasonal irrigation. Of all the water variables measured, crop evapotranspiration related the best with grain yield. Data suggests that trying to increase crop water productivity by deficit-irrigating corn is not a good strategy under the conditions of this study.
Irrigation water supplies are decreasing in many areas of the US Great Plains, which is requiring many farmers to consider deficit-irrigating corn (Zea mays L.) or growing crops like winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) that require less water, but that are less profitable. The objectives of this study were to: (1) quantify the yield response of corn to deficit irrigation, and (2) determine which of several seasonal water variables correlated best to corn yield in a semiarid climate. Eight (T1–T8) and nine (T1–T9) deficit-irrigated treatments (including dryland), were compared in 2003 and 2004 in North Platte, Nebraska. The actual seasonal crop evapotranspiration (ETd) (calculated with procedures in FAO-56) for the different treatments was 37–79% in 2003 and 63–91% in 2004 compared with the seasonal crop evapotranspiration when water is not limited (ETw). Quantitative relationships between grain yield and several seasonal water variables were developed. Water variables included, irrigation (I), total water (Wall), rain + irrigation (WR+I), evaporation (E), crop evapotranspiration (ETd), crop transpiration (Td), and the ratios of ETd and Td to evapotranspiration and transpiration when water is not limited (ETw and Tw). Both years, yield increased linearly with seasonal irrigation, but the relationship varied from year to year. Combining data from both years, ETd had the best correlation to grain yield (yield = 0.028ETd–5.04, R2 = 0.95), and the water variables could be ranked from higher to lower R2 when related to grain yield as: ETd(R2=0.95) > Td(R2=0.93) > ETd = ETw (R2=0.90) = Td/Tw (R2=0.90) > Wall (R2=0.89) > E (R2=0.75) > WR+I (R2=0.65) > I (R2=0:06) . Crop water productivity (CWP) (yield per unit ETd) linearly increased with ETd/ETw (R2 = 0.75), which suggests that trying to increase CWP by deficit-irrigating corn is not a good strategy under the conditions of this study.