Plant Science Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Title: Artificial Inoculation of Wheat for Selecting Resistance to Stagonospora Nodorum Blotch

Authors
item Cowger, Christina
item Murphy, Paul - NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV

Submitted to: Plant Disease
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: November 1, 2006
Publication Date: February 1, 2007
Citation: Cowger, C., Murphy, P. 2007. Artificial Inoculation of Wheat for Selecting Resistance to Stagonospora Nodorum Blotch. Plant Disease. 91:539-545.

Interpretive Summary: In the eastern United States, natural epidemics of Stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB) are not consistently severe enough to facilitate substantial progress in breeding moderately resistant cultivars of soft red winter wheat. We compared three artificial inoculation methods to natural inoculum in a field experiment involving seven wheat cultivars with varying levels of SNB resistance. Artificial inoculation methods were S. nodorum spores applied in the early winter or late spring and S. nodorum-infected wheat straw applied in early winter. The experiment was conducted at Kinston and Plymouth, NC, in 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06, and all treatments had three replicates. Percent diseased canopy was assessed and comparisons were made using disease severity at a single date (early to soft dough stage) and area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC). The relative resistance level of genotypes was consistent across sites, years, and inoculum methods, although the rankings of moderately susceptible and susceptible genotypes were sometimes switched. On average, late spores and straw caused significantly more disease than early spores, which caused more disease than natural inoculum (P ' 0.05). All artificial methods had a higher mean capacity to discriminate among genotypes than did natural inoculum (P ' 0.05). Across inoculation methods and genotypes, mean yield and test weight were negatively correlated with disease severity in some, but not all, site-years. On average, artificial inoculation increased the capacity of environments to separate wheat genotypes by SNB resistance.

Technical Abstract: In the eastern United States, natural epidemics of Stagonospora nodorum blotch (SNB) are not consistently severe enough to facilitate substantial progress in breeding moderately resistant cultivars of soft red winter wheat. We compared three artificial inoculation methods to natural inoculum in a field experiment involving seven wheat cultivars with varying levels of SNB resistance. Artificial inoculation methods were S. nodorum spores applied in the early winter or late spring and S. nodorum-infected wheat straw applied in early winter. The experiment was conducted at Kinston and Plymouth, NC, in 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2005-06, and all treatments had three replicates. Percent diseased canopy was assessed and comparisons were made using disease severity at a single date (early to soft dough stage) and area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC). The relative resistance level of genotypes was consistent across sites, years, and inoculum methods, although the rankings of moderately susceptible and susceptible genotypes were sometimes switched. On average, late spores and straw caused significantly more disease than early spores, which caused more disease than natural inoculum (P ' 0.05). All artificial methods had a higher mean capacity to discriminate among genotypes than did natural inoculum (P ' 0.05). Across inoculation methods and genotypes, mean yield and test weight were negatively correlated with disease severity in some, but not all, site-years. On average, artificial inoculation increased the capacity of environments to separate wheat genotypes by SNB resistance.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House