Page Banner

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Research Service

Title: Efficiency of Energy Use for Pregnancy by Crossbred Boer X Spanish Does with Different Litter Size

Authors
item Tovar-Luna, I. - LANGSTON UNIVERSITY, OK
item Goetsch, A. - LANGSTON UNIVERSITY, OK
item Puchala, R. - LANGSTON UNIVERSITY, OK
item Sahlu, T. - LANGSTON UNIVERSITY, OK
item Carstens, G. - TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
item Freetly, Harvey
item Johnson, Z. - UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS

Submitted to: American Society of Animal Science Annual Meeting
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: February 22, 2006
Publication Date: July 10, 2006
Citation: Tovar-Luna, I., Goetsch, A.L., Puchala, R., Sahlu, T., Carstens, G.E., Freetly, H.C., Johnson, Z.B. 2006. Efficiency of energy use for pregnancy by crossbred Boer x Spanish does with different litter size [abstract]. Journal of Animal Science 84(Suppl. 1):26.

Technical Abstract: Twenty-four Boer x Spanish does (3 yr of age, having kidded once previously and with an initial BW of 42.7 ± 1.2 kg) were used to determine the efficiency of ME utilization for pregnancy (k**preg). Six does were nonpregnant and, based on ultrasound determination on day 45 of gestation, six had a litter size (LS) of 1, 2, and 3. However, only 10 of the pregnant does delivered the expected number of kids (three, four, and three with LS of 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Does were fed a diet of approximately 50% concentrate in accordance with assumed maintenance plus pregnancy energy requirements based on estimated nonpregnancy tissue BW and LS. Recovered energy (RE) was determined by subtraction of energy expenditure (EE; respiration calorimetry) near day 80, 100, 120, and 140 of gestation from ME intake (MEI). RE was assumed attributable to pregnancy tissues (fetus, fetal fluids and membranes, uterus, and mammary gland), and ME used for pregnancy (ME**preg) was estimated by subtracting ME**m determined with nonpregnant goats from MEI by those pregnant. For does with actual LS equal to that expected, the no-intercept equation for the regression of RE against ME**preg was: RE = ME**preg x 0.252 (SE = 0.030; R**2 = 0.64), indicating a k**preg of 25%. Although, a regression including LS (1 vs. 2 or 3) suggested greater k**preg for LS of 1 (40.2% ± 5.6) vs. 2 or 3 (20.5% ± 3.2). Regressions for goats with LS different from expected suggested positive effects of use of energy mobilized from nonpregnancy tissues on k**preg and of use of dietary ME for energy accretion in nonpregnancy tissues on the efficiency of whole body ME utilization. In conclusion, the average efficiency of ME use for pregnancy regardless of LS in goats was near 25%, which when considering the expected proportion of all pregnancy tissues attributable to fetal or conceptus tissues implies an energy requirement for pregnancy of goats similar to common recommendations for sheep and cattle.

Last Modified: 9/2/2014
Footer Content Back to Top of Page