Range Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Ecological Site Descriptions
Monitoring & Assessment
Long Term Ecological Research
Long Term Agricultural Research
Landscape Toolbox
Data Catalogs
EcoTrends
 

Title: SPATIAL VARIATION IN REMNANT GRASSES AFTER A GRASSLAND-TO-SHRUBLAND STATE CHANGE: IMPLICATIONS FOR RESTORATION

Authors
item Peters, Debra
item Mariotto, Isabella - NEW MEXICO STATE UNIV
item Havstad, Kris
item Murray, Leigh - NEW MEXICO STATE UNIV

Submitted to: Rangeland Ecology and Management
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: April 24, 2006
Publication Date: July 1, 2006
Repository URL: http://www.srmjournals.org/archive/1551-5028/59/4/pdf/i1551-5028-59-4-343.pdf
Citation: Peters, D.P.C., Mariotto, I., Havstad, K.M., Murray, L.W. 2006. Spatial variation in remnant grasses after a grassland-to-shrubland state change: Implications for restoration. 2006. Rangeland Ecology & Management. 59:343-350.

Interpretive Summary: Degraded rangelands that have converted from grassland to shrubland are notoriously resistant to restoration efforts. We examined the potential for recovery by remnant black grama grasses in a degraded area. Vegetation maps from 1858 showed that black grama was the historic dominant on this site, although current vegetation is dominated by the shrub, creosotebush. Field surveys in 2002-2003 located a total of 3335 individual black grama plants in the 29 ha area. High spatial variation was found in the occurrence and basal area of black grama plants that was related to water availability rather than livestock grazing: most plants were found in or adjacent to an arroyo at a northern aspect and outside a historic exclosure dating to 1930. These remnant plants can be used as propagule sources in restoration efforts. Information on microsite conditions for black grama survival can be used to improve the restoration potential for sites on similar vegetation and soils.

Technical Abstract: Rangelands that have been degraded, such as perennial desert grasslands now dominated by woody shrubs, are notoriously resistant to restoration efforts. Very slow recovery of black grama following cattle and lagomorph exclusion combined with periodic shrub removal since the 1930s at the Jornada Experimental Range exemplifies the difficulties associated with grass restoration. The goal of this research was to examine the potential for recovery by remnant plants in a degraded area as a function of plant location across a landscape. Our objectives were: (1) to determine the historical dominant vegetation and change in dominance through time; (2) to examine relationships between fine scale variation in black grama presence and basal area with variation in environmental condition; and (3) to identify the landscape positions more favorable for restoration. Historical vegetation maps starting in 1858 were combined with a field survey in 2002-2003 of the location of all individual black grama plants in a 29 ha area and spatial data layers in a geographic information system. Results showed that upland grasses, including black grama, dominated the study site in 1858, although tarbush was the dominant species by 1915, and creosotebush is the current dominant. A total of 3335 black grama plants were found for an average density of 0.01 plants/m2. High spatial variation was found in the occurrence and basal area of black grama plants that was related to water availability rather than livestock grazing: most plants were found in or adjacent to an arroyo (67%), at a northern aspect (47%), and outside the 1930 experimental exclosures (43%).These remnant plants can be used as propagule sources in restoration efforts, and information on microsite conditions for black grama survival can be used to improve the restoration potential for sites on similar vegetation and soils.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House