Range and Livestock Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Home
CurrentNutrientContent
Range Comparison Pictures
Animal
Range
Publications
Weed Calculator
 

Title: MEASURING CARBON DIOXIDE FLUX OVER NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS RANGELAND

Authors
item Haferkamp, Marshall
item Macneil, Michael
item Vermeire, Lance
item Muscha, Jennifer

Submitted to: Society for Range Management Meeting Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: October 1, 2005
Publication Date: February 1, 2006
Citation: Haferkamp, M.R., Macneil, M.D., Vermeire, L.T., Muscha, J.M. 2006. Measuring carbon dioxide flux over northern great plains rangeland. Society for Range Management Meeting Abstracts #140.

Interpretive Summary: The role of rangelands in regulating atmospheric CO2 concentrations is a critical issue in global climate change research. Rangelands are complex systems occupying more than 40% of the land area in the world and USA. To better understand this phenomena, we studied effects of burning and grazing on CO2 flux on a silty range site in a mixed-grass prairie with an Eapa fine loam soil. Treatments were: unburned-ungrazed control, burned in autumn 2003, and moderately grazed in May and June 2004 (dry spring) and 2005 (wet spring). Standing crop; leaf area (L); CO2 flux, at 1000 hours above 0.25 m2 of rangeland in an open chamber; photosynthetic active solar radiation (P); soil water (S); and soil and leaf temperatures, were sampled at about 30-day intervals from mid-April to mid-October. Green standing crop on control plots (April-June) ranged from 80 to 369 kg'ha-1 (2004) and 168 to 1172 kg'ha-1 (2005). Grazing removed an average of 35 to 43% green biomass and 45 to 50% leaf area. Day-time CO2 flux ('moles'm=2'sec-1) was best predicted by the relationship: CO2 flux = -5.2389+15.1689+1.754 E-2L+1.955 E-3 P-5.01 E-6 S*L-5.2389 L*P. All variables (P' 0.03) affected CO2 flux. All variables were affected (P'0.01) by the month within year interaction, but S was the only variable affected by treatment (P'0.05), with S significantly lower in burned than in grazed or control plots. Thus, weather, particularly precipitation, appears to exert primary control on CO2 exchange in the Northern Great Plains.

Technical Abstract: The role of rangelands in regulating atmospheric CO2 concentrations is a critical issue in global climate change research. Rangelands are complex systems occupying more than 40% of the land area in the world and USA. To better understand this phenomena, we studied effects of burning and grazing on CO2 flux on a silty range site in a mixed-grass prairie with an Eapa fine loam soil. Treatments were: unburned-ungrazed control, burned in autumn 2003, and moderately grazed in May and June 2004 (dry spring) and 2005 (wet spring). Standing crop; leaf area (L); CO2 flux, at 1000 hours above 0.25 m2 of rangeland in an open chamber; photosynthetic active solar radiation (P); soil water (S); and soil and leaf temperatures, were sampled at about 30-day intervals from mid-April to mid-October. Green standing crop on control plots (April-June) ranged from 80 to 369 kg'ha-1 (2004) and 168 to 1172 kg'ha-1 (2005). Grazing removed an average of 35 to 43% green biomass and 45 to 50% leaf area. Day-time CO2 flux ('moles'm=2'sec-1) was best predicted by the relationship: CO2 flux = -5.2389+15.1689+1.754 E-2L+1.955 E-3 P-5.01 E-6 S*L-5.2389 L*P. All variables (P' 0.03) affected CO2 flux. All variables were affected (P'0.01) by the month within year interaction, but S was the only variable affected by treatment (P'0.05), with S significantly lower in burned than in grazed or control plots. Thus, weather, particularly precipitation, appears to exert primary control on CO2 exchange in the Northern Great Plains.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/21/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House