Livestock Issues Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: PREVENT PATHOGEN CONTAMINATION IN FOOD PRODUCTION ANIMALS

Location: Livestock Issues Research

Title: Effects of Menhaden Fish Meal Or Oil on the Performance and Immune Response of Nursery Pigs

Authors
item Gaines, Aaron - UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
item Carroll, Jeffery
item Fent, Russell - UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
item Allee, Gary - UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI

Submitted to: American Society of Animal Science
Publication Type: Abstract
Publication Acceptance Date: March 15, 2005
Publication Date: July 24, 2005
Citation: Gaines, A., Carroll, J., Fent, R., Allee, G. 2005. Effects of menhaden fish meal or oil on the performance and immune response of nursery pigs [abstract].Journal of Animal Science. Abstract No. 486. 83(1):334.

Technical Abstract: A trial using 210 pigs (TR-4 × PIC C22) was conducted to determine the effects of menhaden fish meal (MFM) or oil (MFO) on the performance and immune response of nursery pigs. Pigs (17 d; 5.31±0.16 kg) were weaned into a nursery facility and allotted to one of six dietary Trts (7 replicate pens/Trt): Trt 1, 0% MFM/MFO; Trt 2, 5% MFM; Trt 3, 10% MFM; Trt 4, 2.5% MFO; Trt 5, 5% MFO; and Trt 6, 5% pet food grade poultry-byproduct meal (PBM). Experimental diets were fed for 21 d. On d 13, a subset of pigs (6 pigs/Trt) was fitted with a jugular catheter for blood collection (30-min intervals for 6 h). On d 14, all pigs (n = 210) were injected i.m. with LPS (15 µg/kg BW). On d 21, pigs were placed onto a common corn-soybean meal fortified diet and growth performance was evaluated until d 28. Prior to LPS challenge (d 0-14), there were no Trt differences for ADG (P > 0.21) or G/F (P > 0.80). However, there was a Trt effect (P < 0.01) for ADFI. Pigs fed 5.0% PBM had lower ADFI (P less than or equal to 0.05) compared to pigs fed 0% MFM/MFO, 5% MFM, and 10% MFM. Post-LPS (d 14-28), there was a Trt effect for ADG (P < 0.02). Pigs fed 10% MFM had increased (P less than or equal to 0.10) ADG compared to pigs fed 0% MFM/MFO, 2.5% MFO, 5% MFO, and 5% PBM. Furthermore, ADG was higher (P less than or equal to 0.10) in pigs fed 5% MFM compared to pigs fed 0% MFM/MFO, 5% MFO, and 5% PBM. There were no Trt differences for ADFI (P > 0.27) or G/F (P > 0.60). There was no Trt effect (P > 0.74) for basal serum cortisol (-1.0, -0.5, and 0 h) prior to LPS challenge. However, post-challenge, there was an overall Trt effect (P < 0.04) on serum cortisol. Serum cortisol was lower in pigs fed 5% MFO compared to pigs fed 0% MFM/MFO (P = 0.09), 5% MFM (P < 0.01), 10% MFM (P < 0.01), and 5% PBM (P < 0.05). Additionally, serum cortisol was lower in pigs fed 2.5% MFO compared to pigs fed 5% MFM (P = 0.06) and 10% MFM (P < 0.04). This research demonstrated that feeding MFM or MFO altered the acute phase immune response which, in the case of MFM, may have led to improved growth performance.

   

 
Project Team
Carroll, Jeffery - Jeff Carroll
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Food Safety, (animal and plant products) (108)
 
 
Last Modified: 11/21/2009
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House