Page Banner

United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Research Service

Title: Soil Co2 Flux in Conventional and Organic Cropping Systems: Comparison of Measurement Methods and Relationship with Soil Moisture

Authors
item Cavigelli, Michel
item White, Kathryn
item Sikora, Lawrence

Submitted to: USDA Greenhouse Gas Symposium
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: March 4, 2005
Publication Date: March 22, 2005
Citation: Cavigelli, M.A., White, J.W., Sikora, L.J. 2005. Soil CO2 flux in conventional and organic cropping systems: comparison of measurement methods and relationship with soil moisture [abstract]. USDA Greenhouse Gas Symposium. p. 243.

Technical Abstract: Accurate measurement of soil carbon dioxide (CO2) flux is necessary to evaluate the effects of cropping systems on global warming potential and to provide accurate estimates of carbon (C) budgets. Soil CO2 fluxes, soil temperature and volumetric water content (VWC) were measured in no till, chisel till and organic cropping systems in order to compare two flux measurement methods and to investigate the effects of soil moisture on CO2 flux under different management regimes. Static versus dynamic closed chamber methods, both using infrared gas analysis to measure CO2 concentrations, were compared in the no till and organic systems. Flux measurements from the chisel till system were made with static chambers only. Cumulative CO2 flux by the static method for the period April to December was highest in the organic system (12.24 + 1.14 g CO2 (m2*hr)-1), intermediate in the chisel till system (9.90 + 0.61 g CO2 (m2*hr)-1), and lowest in the no till system (8.22 + 0.56 g CO2 (m2*hr)-1). In comparison, cumulative CO2 flux by the dynamic method for the period April to October was 20.12 + 0.97 g CO2 (m2*hr)-1 in the organic system and 13.32 + 0.19 g CO2 (m2*hr)-1 in the no-till system. While both methods described the same overall patterns of CO2 flux over time, the dynamic chambers gave almost consistently higher readings than the static chambers (static method = 0.3028*ln(dynamic method) + 0.5952). The discrepancy between methods may be due to a greater reduction in the diffusion gradient of CO2 using the static versus the dynamic method since chambers were covered for a slightly longer period of time using the static method (12 min) than using the dynamic method (less than or equal to 2 min). We investigated the influence of soil moisture on CO2 flux standardized to 25oC using data collected by the dynamic method and found that no till system soils responded differently than organic system soils to changes in soil moisture. Maximum CO2 flux occurred at 20.0% VWC (~38.4% water filled pore space (WFPS)) in the organic system while it occurred at 27.6% VWC (~52.5% WFPS) in the no till system. Also, at soil moisture concentrations lower than 29.1% VWC, CO2 flux was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in the organic system than in the no till system. There were no differences in CO2 flux between these two systems at moisture contents between 29.2% and 39.7% VWC. At soil moisture contents of 39.8% VWC and above CO2 flux was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in the no till system. Greater CO2 flux under organic management is likely due to the greater availability of labile C. We found significantly greater (P less than 0.05) concentrations of dissolved organic C (DOC) in the organic system soil (62.2 + 6.23 mg DOC kg-1) than in the no till system soil (41.0 + 3.43 mg DOC kg-1). The different soil moisture levels at which maximum CO2 flux occurred in the two systems is likely due to significantly greater (P less than 0.001) soil porosity, possibly attributable to an increase in the proportion of macropore space, in the no till system soil (0.48 + 0.0039) than in the tilled organic system soil (0.42 + 0.0085). Thus, as soil moisture increases beyond 20.0% VWC, gas exchange is limited in the organic system soil. In contrast, gas exchange is not limited in the no till soil until moisture reaches 27.6% VWC.

Last Modified: 10/25/2014
Footer Content Back to Top of Page