Forage and Range Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Working Groups
Plants For The West Flash Presentation
Mojave Project
Utah Shrubland Management Project
 

Title: SCREENING FOR SALINITY TOLERANCE IN ALFALFA: A REPEATABLE METHOD

Authors
item Peel, Michael
item Waldron, Blair
item Jensen, Kevin
item Chatterton, N
item Horton, William
item Dudley, Lynn - UTAH STATE UNIV.

Submitted to: Crop Science
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: May 26, 2004
Publication Date: November 2, 2004
Citation: Peel, M., Waldron, B.L., Jensen, K.B., Chatterton, N.J., Horton, W.H., Dudley, L. 2004. Screening for salinity tolerance in alfalfa: a repeatable method. Crop Science, 44:2049-2053

Interpretive Summary: A lack of salt tolerant cultivars may be due in part to inadequate evaluation protocols used for selection. Our objective was to develop a greenhouse protocol that is simple and consistently separates genotypes for their relative ability to survive under saline conditions. In 2000 and 2001, 12 alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars were seeded in 3.8 X 21 cm cone-shaped containers plugged with capillary matting and filled with silica sand. Six-wk old seedlings were submersed in a NaCI-nutrient solution starting at an electrical conductivity of 3.0 dS m-1 and increased 3.0 dS m-1 every 1 to 2 wk for 10 to 13 wk. Probit analysis was used to estimate the time and salt dose to reach 50 (LD50) and 75% (LD75) mortality. Probit results were compared to cultivar ranking for mean percent plant mortality when overall trial mortality reached approximately 50 and 75%. Rank correlations between 2000 and 2001 at the LD50 and LD75 levels were r=0.90 (P<0.001) and r=0.88 (P<0.001), respectively. Rank correlations between 2000 and 2001 based on means when overall trial mortality levels were approximately 50 and 75% were r=0.92 (P<0.001) and r=0.85 (P<0.001), respectively. The correlations between mean percent cultivar mortality rankings and the probit-based ranking were above r=0.90 (P<0.001) in both years. The high correlations verify that this protocol produces repeatable results and provides a method to effectively screen large numbers of plants for survival under saline conditions.

Technical Abstract: A lack of salt tolerant cultivars may be due in part to inadequate evaluation protocols used for selection. Our objective was to develop a greenhouse protocol that is simple and consistently separates genotypes for their relative ability to survive under saline conditions. In 2000 and 2001, 12 alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars were seeded in 3.8 x 21 cm cone-shaped containers plugged with capillary matting and filled with silica sand. Six-wk old seedlings were submersed in a NaCI-nutrient solution starting at an electrical conductivity of 3.0 dS m-1 and increased 3.0 dS m-1 every 1 to 2 wk for 10 to 13 wk. Probit analysis was used to estimate the time and salt dose to reach 50 (LD50) and 75% (LD75) mortality. Probit results were compared to cultivar ranking for mean percent plant mortality when overall trial mortality reached approximately 50 and 75%. Rank correlations between 2000 and 2001 at the LD50 and LD75 levels were r=0.90 (P<0.001) and r=0.88 (P<0.00l), respectively. Rank correlations between 2000 and 2001 based on means when overall trial mortality levels were approximately 50 and 75% were r=0.92 (P<0.001) and r=0.85 (P<0.001), respectively. The correlations between mean percent cultivar mortality rankings and the probit-based ranking were above r=0.90 (P<0.001) in both years. The high correlations verify that this protocol produces repeatable results and provides a method to effectively screen large numbers of plants for survival under saline conditions.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 06/20/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House