Rangeland Resources Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Prairie Heating and CO2 Enrichment (PHACE) Experiment
Remote Sensing
Rangeland Decision-Making Project
 

Title: DROUGHT AND GRAZING IMPACTS ON CO2 FLUXES IN THE COLORADO SHORTGRASS STEPPE

Authors
item Morgan, Jack
item Lecain, Daniel
item Reeder, S
item Schuman, Gerald
item Derner, Justin
item Lauenroth, W - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
item Parton, W - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
item Burke, I - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY

Submitted to: Ecological Society of America Proceedings
Publication Type: Proceedings
Publication Acceptance Date: March 30, 2004
Publication Date: August 3, 2004
Citation: Morgan, J.A., Lecain, D.R., Reeder, S.J., Schuman, G.E., Derner, J.D., Lauenroth, W.K., Parton, W.J., Burke, I.C. 2004. Drought and grazing impacts on co2 fluxes in the colorado shortgrass steppe. Ecological Society Of America Proceedings.

Technical Abstract: To investigate the effect of heavy cattle grazing (75% forage utilization), recommended grazing (40% utilization) and no grazing on CO2 flux of a shortgrass steppe (SGS) at the USDA-ARS Central Plains Experimental Range in northeastern Colorado, a Bowen ratio/energy balance micrometeorological system was utilized. Flux measurements were conducted year-round from 2001 through 2003. In 2001, precipitation was 80% of the long-term average and no detectable effect of grazing intensity on C flux was evident. This null response of CO2 flux to grazing is characteristic of previous work that has shown little to no significant effects of stocking rate on seasonal CO2 fluxes. However, in 2002, precipiation was only about 50% of average, and as a result, cattle were removed from the pastures in mid-July. Nevertheless, CO2 exchange was strongly affected by grazing treatment. Net CO2 assimilation was lowest in the heavily grazed pasture and highest in the ungrazed pasture while CO2 assimilation in the moderately grazed pasture was intermediate between the other two treatments. Heavy grazing caused a a net loss of C from the ecosystem. These results suggess that while the SGS may be resilient to grazing in the long-term, in the short-term, livestock removal or reductions in stocking rate may be important for maintaining a positive C balance during projected periods of drought.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/24/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House