Range and Livestock Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Home
CurrentNutrientContent
Range Comparison Pictures
Animal
Range
Publications
Weed Calculator
 

Title: EFFICACY OF AN INTRAVAGINAL PROGESTERONE INSERT AND AN INJECTION OF PGF-{2¿}- TO ADVANCE DATE OF BREEDING IN POSTPARTUM BEEF COWS WHILE UTILIZING NATURAL SERVICE

Authors
item Olson, J - MONTANA STATE UNIV
item Roberts, Andrew
item Ansotegui, R - MONTANA STATE UNIV
item Paterson, J - MONTANA STATE UNIV
item Funston, R - UNIV NEBRASKA LINCOLN

Submitted to: Journal of Animal Science Supplement
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: April 1, 2004
Publication Date: July 1, 2004
Citation: Olson, J.L., Roberts, A.J., Ansotegui, R.P., Paterson, J.A., Funston, R.N. 2004. Efficacy of an intravaginal progesterone insert and an injection of pgf-{2¿}- to advance date of breeding in postpartum beef cows while utilizing natural service. Journal of Animal Science Supplement 82(2):117.

Interpretive Summary: The objective of this experiment was to compare breeding date and overall pregnancy rates in beef cows given a single i.m. injection of 25 mg PGF-{2'}- (Lutalyse; control) on d 7 of a natural breeding season with or without 7-d pretreatment with an intravaginal progesterone insert (CIDR). Crossbred cows from two locations were stratified by age within location and randomly allotted to either treatment or control; CIDR were inserted on d 0 and removed on d 7; location 1:n=224, 3.36 ' .04 yr age, 62.5 ± 1.21 d postpartum (PP), 513.9 ± 4.6 kg BW, and 3.9 ± .04 BCS; location 2:n=74, 4.64 ' .15 yr age, 58.4 ± 1.17 d PP, 488.8 ± 6.4 kg BW, and 4.74 ± 0.57 BCS. Bulls were placed with cows in each herd from d 0 to d 60. Day of conception and cycle conceived (21 day periods) were estimated by ultrasonography on d 66 and 73; and again by rectal palpation on d 176 and 123 for locations 1 and 2, respectively. These response variables were analyzed with a model that included d PP, BCS, BW, and age at d 0 as covariates and location and treatment as fixed effects (location by treatment not significant). Days to conception (26.7 vs. 29.7 d for CIDR vs. control) and cycle (1.63 vs. 1.76 for CIDR vs. control) of conception tended (P < 0.13) to be decreased with CIDR. The number of pregnancies lost between first and second pregnancy diagnosis, did not differ (P = 0.31) between CIDR (7) and control (9). No beneficial affect of CIDR was observed (P = 0.23) for the cycle that cows became pregnant and remained pregnant. Overall pregnancy rates were not affected by treatment (P > 0.32) at either location 1 (99.6%) or 2 (97.3%). In conclusion, treatment with a CIDR and an injection of PGF-{2'}- was not effective in increasing overall pregnancy rates or advancing breeding date compared to cows receiving PGF-{2'}- on day 7 of the breeding season.

Technical Abstract: The objective of this experiment was to compare breeding date and overall pregnancy rates in beef cows given a single i.m. injection of 25 mg PGF-{2'}- (Lutalyse; control) on d 7 of a natural breeding season with or without 7-d pretreatment with an intravaginal progesterone insert (CIDR). Crossbred cows from two locations were stratified by age within location and randomly allotted to either treatment or control; CIDR were inserted on d 0 and removed on d 7; location 1:n=224, 3.36 ' .04 yr age, 62.5 ± 1.21 d postpartum (PP), 513.9 ± 4.6 kg BW, and 3.9 ± .04 BCS; location 2:n=74, 4.64 ' .15 yr age, 58.4 ± 1.17 d PP, 488.8 ± 6.4 kg BW, and 4.74 ± 0.57 BCS. Bulls were placed with cows in each herd from d 0 to d 60. Day of conception and cycle conceived (21 day periods) were estimated by ultrasonography on d 66 and 73; and again by rectal palpation on d 176 and 123 for locations 1 and 2, respectively. These response variables were analyzed with a model that included d PP, BCS, BW, and age at d 0 as covariates and location and treatment as fixed effects (location by treatment not significant). Days to conception (26.7 vs. 29.7 d for CIDR vs. control) and cycle (1.63 vs. 1.76 for CIDR vs. control) of conception tended (<i>P</i> < 0.13) to be decreased with CIDR. The number of pregnancies lost between first and second pregnancy diagnosis, did not differ (<i>P</i> = 0.31) between CIDR (7) and control (9). No beneficial affect of CIDR was observed (<i>P</i> = 0.23) for the cycle that cows became pregnant and remained pregnant. Overall pregnancy rates were not affected by treatment (<i>P</i> > 0.32) at either location 1 (99.6%) or 2 (97.3%). In conclusion, treatment with a CIDR and an injection of PGF-{2'}- was not effective in increasing overall pregnancy rates or advancing breeding date compared to cows receiving PGF-{2'}- on day 7 of the breeding season.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 06/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House