Coastal Plain Soil, Water and Plant Conservation Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Cotton Project Overall View
Manure Project Overall View
Soil Project Overall View
Water project Overall View
Second Generation Treatment System
 

Title: VARYING CONE INDICES FOR DEEP TILLAGE AND SOUTHEASTERN USA COASTAL PLAIN HARDPAN SOILS

Authors
item Busscher, Warren
item Bauer, Philip
item Frederick, James - CLEMSON UNIV, FLORENCE

Submitted to: International Soil Tillage Research Organization Proceedings
Publication Type: Proceedings
Publication Acceptance Date: June 26, 2003
Publication Date: November 1, 2003
Citation: BUSSCHER, W.J., BAUER, P.J., FREDERICK, J.R. VARYING CONE INDICES FOR DEEP TILLAGE AND SOUTHEASTERN USA COASTAL PLAIN HARDPAN SOILS. INTERNATIONAL SOIL TILLAGE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION PROCEEDINGS. 2003. p. 242-247.

Technical Abstract: We evaluated double-crop wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and drilled soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) in deep-tilled hardpan soils. Soybean and wheat were drilled in 19-cm-row widths in plots that had different coastal soils at either end. Treatments included surface tillage (disked or none), deep tillage (paratilled or none), additional treatments that were rotated with maize (Zea mays L.) and winter fallow, and a final treatment that was disked, deep tilled with a conventional in-row subsoiler, and planted in 76-cm-wide rows. Rainfall was erratic throughout the experiment with long dry periods. Cone indices were measured at two places in each plot 120 m apart to assess soil strength differences within and among treatments. Cone indices were higher for non-deep tilled treatments vs. deep tilled treatments. They were also higher in wheel tracks vs. non-wheel tracks and in soil types with shallower B horizons. Cone indices of subsoiled treatments were not significantly different from paratilled treatments. Yields were greater for deep tilled soils. Yields were also greater for paratilled than for subsoiled or non-paratilled treatments partly as a result of the more complete disruption of the paratill and partly because the paratilled treatments were managed with narrow rows. Different soil types did not have yield differences despite the fact that they had different cone indices. Tillage was a more dominant factor than soil type during this study because it softened the soil for potential root exploration during times of water stress.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/24/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House