Coastal Plain Soil, Water and Plant Conservation Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Cotton Project Overall View
Manure Project Overall View
Soil Project Overall View
Water project Overall View
Second Generation Treatment System
 

Title: SPATIAL VARIATION OF N FERTILIZER RESPONSE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN USA COASTAL PLAIN

Authors

Submitted to: European Conference on Precision Agriculture Proceedings
Publication Type: Proceedings
Publication Acceptance Date: June 16, 2003
Publication Date: June 15, 2003
Citation: Sadler, E.J., Camp Jr, C.R., Evans, D.E., Millen, J.A. 2003. Spatial variation of n fertilizer response in the southeastern usa coastal plain. In: Proceedings of 4th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, Wageningen Academic Press, Wageningen, The Netherlands. p. 603-608 (CDROM).

Technical Abstract: Within the southeastern USA Coastal Plain, spatial variation in grain yield may justify site-specific management. Two experiments examining yield in response to irrigation and N for maize were conducted during 1999-2001 using center pivots modified to independently irrigate and fertigate 9 x 9 m plots. Under one pivot (CP2), we examined irrigation and N fertilizer response functions for twelve soil map units in a typical field, emphasizing soil variation and irrigation response. Under another (CP1), we examined the same responses on the predominant soil, emphasizing N response. N response was calculated as R = (YhiN - YloN) / (Nhi - Nlo), where Y is yield (kg/ha), N is N rate (kg/ha), and hi and lo indicate the specific N treatment. Under CP2, R ranged from -47 to 39 kg/kg in 1999, from -22 to 60 kg/kg in 2000, and from -30 to 50 kg/kg in 2001. Negative values suggested that N was not the yield-limiting factor. Spatial variation of R under CP1, on the more-uniform soil, was less but not negligible. In both cases, the response surface showed distinct spatial patterns. The challenge is to explain the causes and incorporate them into precision agriculture recommendations.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/25/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House