Forage and Livestock Production Unit Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Title: SOLUBLE SUGARS OF OKLAHOMA FORAGES HARVESTED IN MORNING AND AFTERNOON: STOCKER PREFERENCE.

Authors
item Appeddu, Lisa
item Coleman, Samuel
item Phillips, William

Submitted to: ASA-CSSA-SSSA Proceedings
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: November 1, 2002
Publication Date: November 1, 2002
Citation: Appeddu, L.A., Coleman, S.W., Phillips, W.A. 2002. Soluble sugars of oklahoma forages harvested in morning and afternoon: stocker preference.. ASA-CSSA-SSSA Proceedings. Poster #C06-appeddu112923.

Technical Abstract: The effect of hay harvest time and soluble carbohydrate (SC) concentration on stocker lamb preference was evaluated. Paiute orchardgrass, Luna pubescent wheatgrass, Triumph fescue, and Jose tall wheatgrass were cut for hay at 0730 (AM) and 1400 (PM). Twelve stocker lambs (29 +/- 4.0 kg) selected between AM and PM harvests. Difference was calculated by subtracting intake of PM from AM hay. Concentration of SC in AM versus PM hays were Paiute (7.9 vs 11.2%), Luna (8.6 vs 10.4%), Triumph (9.9 vs 9.4%) and Jose (9.7 vs 10.8%). Lambs consumed more (P < 0.001) PM than AM hay (291 vs 164 +/- 13.6 g). Difference in hay dry matter intake for PM and AM hays ranked Jose (181 g) > Triumph (156 g) > Luna (98 g) > Paiute (73 g). SC intake difference was greater for Paiute than Triumph hay (17 vs 7 +/- 2.2 g; P< 0.01), but total SC intake was similar across hays. Concentration of SC was positively correlated with hay intake for Jose (0.68; P< 0.001), but negatively for Triumph (-0.79; P< 0.001). Intake rate was lowest (P=0.03) for Triumph AM hay. Cutting cool season grasses later in the day increased lamb preference, but differences in soluble carbohydrate did not explain all selection differences.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/22/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House