Range Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Ecological Site Descriptions
Monitoring & Assessment
Long Term Ecological Research
Long Term Agricultural Research
Landscape Toolbox
Data Catalogs
EcoTrends
 

Title: SECONDARY METABOLITE PROFILES OF PALATABLE AND UNPALATABLE POPULATIONS OF CERATOIDES LANATA

Authors

Submitted to: Society for Range Management Meeting Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: February 13, 2002
Publication Date: February 13, 2002
Citation: LUCERO, M.E., ESTELL, R.E., ANDERSON, D.M., FREDRICKSON, E.L., HAVSTAD, K.M., REMMENGA, M. SECONDARY METABOLITE PROFILES OF PALATABLE AND UNPALATABLE POPULATIONS OF CERATOIDES LANATA. 55TH ANNUAL MEETING, SOCIETY FOR RANGE MANAGEMENT. 2002. ABSTRACT P. 86.

Technical Abstract: Ceratoides lanata var. lanata (common winterfat) is a prolific chenopod on rangelands throughout the western United States. The plant is valued by livestock producers for its nutrient content and palatability to livestock. The subspecies C. lanata var. subspinosa, native to the southwestern U.S. and northern Mexico, is reported to be unpalatable to livestock. Curiously, fenceline observations of C. lanata var. subspinosa growing north of the Chihuahuan Desert suggest its palatability varies. The availability of palatable and unpalatable phenotypes make C. lanata and C. lanata var. subspinosa useful models to use for identification of secondary compounds influencing diet selection. In this study, actively growing shoots from 10 winterfat populations (10 plants per sampling) in New Mexico, Utah, and west Texas were sampled in early, mid, and late phenological stages. Samples were separated into palatable and nonpalatable populations. Steam distillation of composite samples reveale extremely low levels of volatiles, discouraging further analysis of winterfat volatiles. Nonvolatiles were extracted in 80% ethanol and separated by liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection. Peaks which differ significantly between populations are being identified by uV and mass spectroscopy and by comparison with standards when available. Differences in chemical profiles between palatable and unpalatable winterfat populations will point to chemicals that influence diet selection among large ruminants.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/18/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House