Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
 
National Programs
International Programs
Find Research Projects
The Research Enterprise
Office of Scientific Quality Review
Research Initiatives
 

Title: DETECTION OF SYNERGISTES JONESII IN CATTLE AND SHEEP FECES

Authors
item Andrew, W - WALT DISNEY WORLD CO.
item Williams, Mary
item Allison, Milton
item Chase, Chadwick
item Chambliss, C - UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
item Kalmbacher, R - UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
item Kunkle, W - UNIVERSITY OF FL

Submitted to: American Forage and Grassland Conference Proceedings
Publication Type: Proceedings
Publication Acceptance Date: July 16, 2000
Publication Date: July 16, 2000

Technical Abstract: Leucaena, Leucaena leucocephala, may be useful in feeding systems for zoo- logical ruminants, but determining Synergistes jonesii status in zoological ruminants is necessary before it can be used. The objective of this study was to determine if current methods developed for detecting S. jonesii in cattle feces are applicable to drier fecal materials commonly found in zoological ruminants by using sheep (Ovis sp.) as a model. Feces and rumen fluid from cattle (Bos sp., n=2) and sheep (n=4) colonized with S. jonesii were collected and directly injected into culture media. Additionally, for the sheep only, a fecal slurry (1:4 wt. feces to vol. water) was made and injected into culture media. There was a species by incubation time inter- action (P<.07) for fecal samples because S. jonesii was detected in samples sooner (P<.09) from sheep than cattle, but by 16-wk incubation time, detection level in the fecal samples did not differ (50 vs. 37% for sheep and cattle, respectively; P=.71). Throughout the incubation period, the level of detection of S. jonesii in sheep was higher (P<.05) in rumen fluid than the average of the fecal samples (100 vs. 49%, respectively, at 16 wk), but there was no difference (P=.53) due to fecal preparation.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 06/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House