Range and Livestock Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Home
CurrentNutrientContent
Range Comparison Pictures
Animal
Range
Publications
Weed Calculator
 

Title: SYNCHRONIZATION OF OVULATION USING HCG OR GNRH WITH THE CO-SYNCH PROTOCOL IN SUCKLED BEEF COWS

Authors
item Salverson, Robin - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
item Whittier, Jack - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
item Downing, Eric - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
item Geary, Thomas

Submitted to: Western Section of Animal Science Proceedings
Publication Type: Proceedings
Publication Acceptance Date: June 1, 1999
Publication Date: June 1, 1999
Citation: SALVERSON, R.R., WHITTIER, J.C., DOWNING, E.R., GEARY, T.W. SYNCHRONIZATION OF OVULATION USING HCG OR GNRH WITH THE CO-SYNCH PROTOCOL IN SUCKLED BEEF COWS. WESTERN SECTION OF ANIMAL SCIENCE PROCEEDINGS. 1999. v. 50. p. 35-38.

Interpretive Summary: The objectives of this study were to evaluate hCG in place of GnRH and the effects of 48-h calf removal (CR) on pregnancy rates of cows synchronized with the CO-Synch protocol. Suckled beef cows (n = 467) within two locations were assigned to receive either GnRH or hCG with or without CR in the CO-Synch protocol. On d 0 and d 9, cows received either 2500 IU of hCG or 100 mu g of GnRH i.m. and on d 7 all cows received PGF2alpha. At one location, blood samples were collected from all cows on d -14, -7, 0, 7, 9, & 16. Serum from each sample was analyzed for progesterone level to identify cyclic and anestrous cows (d -14, -7, & 0) and corpora lutea presence (d 7), regression (d 9), and ovulatory response(d 16). Calves were removed from half of the cows that received GnRH or hCG on d 7 and returned on d 9. Visual observation (3x daily) was used to identify estrual cows. Cows that exhibited estrus were bred 12 h later, and those not observed in estrus by d 9 were mass mated and received a second injection of either GnRH or hCG. Pregnancy status was determined at both locations 40 d following timed AI. The AI pregnancy rate for GnRH treated cows with and without CR and hCG treated cows with and without CR was 46%, 50%, 35%, 34%, respectively. The hCG treated cows (34%) had a lower (P<.05) pregnancy rate than GnRH treated cows (48%) regardless of CR. More (P<.05) hCG treated cows exhibited short estrous cycles following timed AI. In addition, there tended to be more (P=.2) hCG treated cows with elevated progesterone at the timed AI. Temporary CR had no effect (P>.1) on AI pregnancy rate of cows within hormone treatments. We conclude hCG is not a suitable replacement for GnRH to synchronize ovulation with the CO-Synch protocol.

Technical Abstract: The objectives of this study were to evaluate hCG in place of GnRH and the effects of 48-h calf removal (CR) on pregnancy rates of cows synchronized with the CO-Synch protocol. Suckled beef cows (n = 467) within two locations were assigned to receive either GnRH or hCG with or without CR in the CO-Synch protocol. On d 0 and d 9, cows received either 2500 IU of hCG or 100 mu g of GnRH i.m. and on d 7 all cows received PGF2alpha. At one location, blood samples were collected from all cows on d -14, -7, 0, 7, 9, & 16. Serum from each sample was analyzed for progesterone level to identify cyclic and anestrous cows (d -14, -7, & 0) and corpora lutea presence (d 7), regression (d 9), and ovulatory response(d 16). Calves were removed from half of the cows that received GnRH or hCG on d 7 and returned on d 9. Visual observation (3x daily) was used to identify estrual cows. Cows that exhibited estrus were bred 12 h later, and those not observed in estrus by d 9 were mass mated and received a second injection of either GnRH or hCG. Pregnancy status was determined at both locations 40 d following timed AI. The AI pregnancy rate for GnRH treated cows with and without CR and hCG treated cows with and without CR was 46%, 50%, 35%, 34%, respectively. The hCG treated cows (34%) had a lower (P<.05) pregnancy rate than GnRH treated cows (48%) regardless of CR. More (P<.05) hCG treated cows exhibited short estrous cycles following timed AI. In addition, there tended to be more (P=.2) hCG treated cows with elevated progesterone at the timed AI. Temporary CR had no effect (P>.1) on AI pregnancy rate of cows within hormone treatments. We conclude hCG is not a suitable replacement for GnRH to synchronize ovulation with the CO-Synch protocol.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/25/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House