Skip to main content
ARS Home » Research » Publications at this Location » Publication #267918

Title: Consideration of drainage ditches and sediment rating cure on SWAT model performance

Author
item Sadeghi, Ali
item SEXTON, AISHA - University Of Maryland
item McCarty, Gregory
item LANG, MEGAN - Us Forest Service (FS)
item HIVELY, DEAN - Us Geological Survey (USGS)
item SHIRMOHAMMADI, ADEL - University Of Maryland

Submitted to: ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: 4/26/2011
Publication Date: 10/16/2011
Citation: Sadeghi, A.M., Sexton, A., McCarty, G.W., Lang, M., Hively, D., Shirmohammadi, A. 2011. Consideration of drainage ditches and sediment rating cure on SWAT model performance [abstract]. ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts. 2011 CDROM.

Interpretive Summary:

Technical Abstract: Water quality models most often require a considerable amount of data to be properly configured and in some cases this requires additional procedural steps prior to model applications. We examined two different scenarios of such input issues in a small watershed using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The German Branch (~50 km2) is a sub-watershed of the Choptank, a USDA’s Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) benchmark watershed in Maryland. To provide the most accurate model estimates of watershed response, consideration must be given to the unique features of the watershed as well as the quality of available input data. One set-up scenario addressed the issue of accounting for copious drainage ditches within the study area by comparing stream flow estimates derived using a conventional Digital Elevation Model (DEM) versus a DEM, hand-edited to include drainage ditches in the topography. The second set-up scenario examined the issue of estimating measured sediment loads for time-periods lacking data using a sediment rating curve. Preliminary results showed a slight improvement in model performance (a 4% increase in NSE value) to estimate flow during the calibration period and a significant decrease in model performance (15% in NSE value) during the validation period when using the DEM edited to include the extensive ditch network of the GB. Although the method used to derive sediment loading data was quick and rudimentary, it provided a good calibration of the sediment component of SWAT in the GB considering the limited amount of measured data available. This method however is not expected to always give good results especially with more drastic changes in land use and climate in the region.