Title: Herbicide drift affects plant and arthropod communities Authors
|Egan Jr, John|
|Bohnenblust, Eric -|
|Mortensen, David -|
|Tooker, John -|
Submitted to: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: December 16, 2013
Publication Date: February 10, 2014
Citation: Egan Jr, J.F., Bohnenblust, E., Goslee, S.C., Mortensen, D.A., Tooker, J. 2014. Herbicide drift affects plant and arthropod communities. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 185:77-87. Interpretive Summary: Herbicides used for weed control can drift away from crop fields and harm wildflowers and other desirable plants growing in nearby habitats. In this experiment, we simulated herbicide drift by treating vegetation along the edge of an alfalfa field and in a wildflower meadow with low doses of the herbicide dicamba. Because dicamba is toxic to broadleaf plants but not grasses, we found that in plots treated with dicamba the abundance of broadleaf species and the flowering of some wildflower species that support pollinators declined substantially. These changes in the vegetation also altered insect communities: some crop pest species declined in plots treated with dicamba while other pest species increased. Growers using dicamba and other herbicides should be mindful of nearby natural vegetation, apply herbicides only under appropriate, low-wind weather conditions, and use coarse droplet nozzles and other drift-reducing application technologies.
Technical Abstract: Field edges, old fields, and other semi-natural habitats in agricultural landscapes support diverse plant communities that help sustain pollinators, predators, and other beneficial arthropods. These plant and arthropod communities may be at persistent ecotoxicological risk from herbicides applied to nearby crop fields. Recent innovations in herbicide-resistant crop biotechnology may lead to major increases in the use of the herbicides dicamba and 2,4-D. These herbicides selectively affect broadleaf plants, and non-target exposures may therefore lead to a net reduction in the functional diversity and floral resources provided by semi-natural habitats. In multi-year experiments at two sites (a field edge and an old field), we exposed replicated plots to low doses of dicamba designed to simulate herbicide drift and monitored changes in plant and arthropod communities. At the field edge site, we observed a significant decline in forb cover (but not floral resources) in plots treated at doses (~1% of the field application rate) that are substantially lower than those that have been documented to affect plant communities in previous research. We also observed declines in three herbivorous pest species (pea aphids, spotted alfalfa aphid, and potato leaf hopper), increases in one pest species (clover root curculio), and increases in beneficial seed predators (crickets) associated with dicamba exposure. In contrast, at the old field site, drift-level doses did not affect plant community structure but reduced flowering of a key species (Monarda fistulosa). Factors including the successional age of the plant community and water stress at the time of herbicide exposure likely explain the differing responses at the two sites to simulated drift.