Title: Establishing turfgrass on water repellent soil with ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer surfactant seed coatings Authors
|Kostka, Stanley -|
|Mcmillan, Mica -|
Submitted to: Meeting Proceedings
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: March 1, 2013
Publication Date: May 24, 2013
Citation: Madsen, M.D., Kostka, S.J., Hulet, A., Mcmillan, M.F. 2013. Establishing turfgrass on water repellent soil with ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer surfactant seed coatings [abstract]. Biohydrology Confernce, May 21-24, 2013, Landau/Pfalz, Germany. Paper No. P2-24. Technical Abstract: Turfgrass managers can experience poor seeding success when trying to establish golf course greens and sports fields in water repellent soils. Nonionic soil surfactant formulations are commonly used to treat water repellent soils and subsequently increase water reserves for seed germination and plant establishment. Typically, irrigation water is used as a carrier in the application of soil surfactants. While this approach is effective, it can be costly and difficult to apply in certain environments. Our purpose was to describe a more efficient approach for applying soil surfactants using seed coating technology. Within a laboratory grow-room study, we compared the response of non-coated seed to seed coated with an ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymer surfactant. Three surfactant-loading rates were evaluated in the study, 60, 80, and 100% weight of product to weight of seed (wt/wt). Seeds were sown in either a severely water repellent or non-water repellent soil. In the water repellent soil, all surfactant coatings were effective in ameliorating water repellency and increasing plant establishment, with response parameters similar between the coating treatments. During the first nine days of the study, when tall fescue was germinating and emerging, soil water content in the water repellent soil was on average 94% higher in pots sown with surfactant-coated seed, than non-coated seed. Plant density, cover, and above- and belowground biomass was respectively 79, 589, 429, and 244% higher than that produced from non-coated seed. In the wettable soil, moderate improvements in density, cover, and biomass was realized from the surfactant seed coating treatment, particularly at the 60% wt/wt loading rate. These results provide evidence that soil surfactants can be affectively applied using seed coating technology. Future field research is justified for testing surfactant seed coatings to establish golf course greens and sports fields from seed.