Watershed Physical Processes Research Unit Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation 2 - Changes in 2010
Test
 

Research Project: TECHNOLOGIES FOR MANAGING WATER AND SEDIMENT MOVEMENT IN AGRICULTURAL WATERSHEDS

Location: Watershed Physical Processes Research Unit

Title: Elemental chemistry of sand-boil discharge used to trace variable pathways of seepage beneath levees during the 2011 Mississippi River flood

Authors
item Davidson, Gregg -
item Rigby, James
item Pennington, Dean -
item Cizdziel, James -

Submitted to: Applied Geochemistry
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: October 23, 2012
Publication Date: January 1, 2013
Citation: Davidson, G., Rigby Jr, J.R., Pennington, D., Cizdziel, J. 2013. Elemental chemistry of sand-boil discharge used to trace variable pathways of seepage beneath levees during the 2011 Mississippi River flood. Applied Geochemistry. 28:62-68.

Interpretive Summary: The integrity of the levee system along the Mississippi River is of the utmost concern for the prevention of human loss of life and serious economic damages to communities and cropland. During floods water may bypass levees through subsurface pathways and re-surface through “sand boils” beyond the levee. The pathway taken by the water, whether seeping through the levee or upwelling from deep groundwater, is a major factor in determining whether a sand boil behind the levee is indicative of a potential levee failure. Scientists at the USDA-ARS National Sedimentation laboratory and the University of Mississippi in cooperation with the Yazoo Water Management District collected and analyzed water samples from a number of sites along the levee system north of Vicksburg, MS during the flood of May 2011. Sample sites included sand boils, relief wells, an irrigation well and the river itself. Results of a chemical analysis of the water samples show that a chemical signature can be used to differentiate deep and shallow water flow pathways. This analysis may be developed into a near real-time method to diagnose potential weak points in levees during flood conditions.

Technical Abstract: Water samples were collected from the Mississippi River, from sand boils near the toe of the levee on the Mississippi side of the river, and from actively flowing relief wells shortly after peak stage of the 2011 Mississippi River flood. Two distinct pathways for seepage under the levee were identified based on the elemental composition of water samples. Fe, Mn, and As proved particularly useful to differentiate shallow and deep seepage pathways. The elemental composition of sand boil discharge was similar to water from relief wells only at a location where the levee sits on channel fill deposits. Seepage at this site is forced under the channel fill, forcing deeper aquifer water to the surface. Where the levee sits on point bar deposits, shallow lateral flow beneath the levee is unimpeded. The chemical composition of discharge from sand boils at these sites was clearly not just river water, nor a simple mixture of river and groundwater, but reflected the unique weathering and redox interactions occurring within the upper portion of the alluvial aquifer. Distinguishing shallow and deep seepage pathways may prove useful for evaluating site specific risk of levee failure.

   

 
Project Team
Kuhnle, Roger
Dabney, Seth
Wells, Robert - Rob
Wilson, Glenn
Rigby, James - Jr
Wren, Daniel
Romkens, Mathias - Matt
Bonta, James - Jim
Langendoen, Eddy
Bingner, Ronald - Ron
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Water Availability and Water Management (211)
  Climate Change, Soils, and Emissions (212)
  Bioenergy (213)
 
Related Projects
   ASSESSMENT OF EPHEMERAL GULLY EROSION PROCESSES
   CHARACTERIZATION AND SIMULATION OF CHANNEL ADJUSTMENTS IN RESERVOIR DEPOSITS FOLLOWING DAM REMOVAL
   Enhancement of the Channel Evolution Model CONCEPTS for Predicting Water Quality Benefits of Rretention of Riverine Sediments by Floodplains
   CUMULATIVE IMPACTS/EFFECTS OF PLANNED BANK STABILIZATION ALONG THE BIG SIOUX RIVER AND SKUNK CREEK, SOUTH DAKOTA
   UPDATING NRCS TECHNICAL RELEASE #56 WITH FLOATING WAVE BARRIER GUIDANCE
   REVISED UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION, VERSION 2 (RUSLE2) ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT
   DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SCIENTIFIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR RUSLE2
   CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT (CEAP) (2011) - ARS BENCHMARK WATERSHED STUDIES
   CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT (CEAP) (2011) - ARS BENCHMARK WATERSHED STUDIES
   Maxium Sediment Capacity of Saltating Sediment Size Mixtures
   PROGRAMMERS GUIDE TO THE RUSLE2 SOURCE CODE
   UPDATING NRCS TECHNICAL RELEASE #56 WITH FLOATING WAVE BARRIER GUIDANCE
   SUPPORT OF THE REVISED UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION, VERSION 2 (RUSLE2)
   DATA BASE DEVELOPMENT FOR NORTH APPALACHIAN EXPERIMENTAL WATERSHED (NAEW) DATA
   Quantifying the Spatial Location of Small-scale Land Management Changes in Large Watersheds Using Hydrological Modeling
   MORE EFFICIENT SCIENCE CALCULATION OF THE REVISED UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION, VERSION 2 (RUSLE2)
   GEOSPATIAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF WATERSHED PROCESSES AT MULTIPLE SCALES
   Geospatial information research for improved watershed management practice assessments in the USA and China
   Advancement of Erosion Modeling and Precision Conservation Planning to Target Ephemeral Gully Control in the Lower South Fork Watershed
   Conservation Effects Assessment Project Croplands Watersheds Studies - Gulf Coast & Western Watersheds (2012)
   Land Management Data within Goodwin Creek Watershed
   Improved Understanding of Erosion Processes and Evaluation of Conservation Practices in Agricultural Watersheds
 
 
Last Modified: 05/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House