Cotton Ginning Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: ENHANCING QUALITY, UTILITY, SUSTAINABILITY, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF COTTON AND ITS BYPRODUCTS THROUGH IMPROVEMENT IN HARVEST/GIN PROCESSING

Location: Cotton Ginning Research

Title: Ginning U.S. cotton for domestic and export markets

Authors

Submitted to: National Cotton Council Beltwide Cotton Conference
Publication Type: Proceedings
Publication Acceptance Date: May 17, 2011
Publication Date: May 18, 2011
Citation: Hughs, S.E., Armijo, C.B., Byler, R.K., Whitelock, D.P. 2011. Ginning U.S. cotton for domestic and export markets. National Cotton Council Beltwide Cotton Conference. 569-577.

Interpretive Summary: The U.S. cotton crop is produced by a highly mechanized production system that seeks to minimize manual labor while maximizing fiber quality. It is estimated that a bale of U.S. cotton is produced using approximately three man hours of labor while foreign producers may utilize several hundred man hours per bale. However, in comparison to growths that utilize hand picking and significant manual labor for processing, U.S. mechanization has resulted in some ginned fiber quality problems such as neps and short fiber. A significant proportion of current ginning research is aimed at addressing these fiber quality issues and improving the quality of U.S. cotton fiber. This paper looks at the impact that various current ginning practices have on the quality of U.S. cottons.

Technical Abstract: The U.S. cotton crop is produced by a highly mechanized production system that seeks to minimize manual labor while maximizing fiber quality. It is estimated that a bale of U.S. cotton is produced using approximately three man hours of labor while foreign producers may utilize several hundred man hours per bale. U.S. mechanization has resulted in an increase in some ginned fiber quality problems in comparison to foreign growths that utilize hand picking and significant manual labor for processing. The majority of U.S. cotton production is exported and must compete in fiber quality with hand-picked cottons for markets. U.S. cotton competes very well in low levels of bale contamination with foreign material, accurate and reliable fiber parameter classification, integrity of the individual cotton bale, and reliability of contract fulfillment. However, American cotton receives complaints from foreign customers of lower length uniformity, increased short fiber and increased neps in comparison to hand-picked cottons. These particular quality factors are affected by the level of mechanical processing that cotton fiber receives during the harvesting and ginning process. As a result, a significant proportion of current ginning research is aimed at improving the mechanical processing of cotton to decrease the impact on baled fiber quality and making U.S. cotton more competitive in all raw fiber quality areas. This paper looks at the impact that various current U.S. ginning practices have on the quality of U.S. cottons.

   

 
Project Team
Whitelock, Derek
Armijo, Carlos
Baker, Kevin
Funk, Paul
Hughs, Sidney - Hughs Ed
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Climate Change, Soils, and Emissions (212)
  Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products (306)
 
Related Projects
   USING CONVEYING AIR TEMPERATURE TO PREDICT SEED COTTON MOISTURE CONTENT
   DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETITIVE HIGH QUALITY AND ACALA 1517 COTTON THROUGH ENHANCED GINNING/TEXTILE PROCESSING PERFORMANCE
   DIFFERENTIAL ROLLER GINNING OF UPLAND COTTON
   EXAMINING GIN STANDS AND LINT CLEANERS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF UPLAND COTTON
   INVESTIGATING SEED COTTON RECLAIMERS TO IMPROVE THE PRODUCTIVITY OF ROLLER GINNING PLANTS
   Removing Seed Coat Fragments During Lint Cleaning
 
 
Last Modified: 05/19/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House