Agricultural Systems Research Unit Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: ENHANCED SYSTEM MODELS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS TO OPTIMIZE WATER LIMITED AGRICULTURE

Location: Agricultural Systems Research Unit

Title: Simulating the surface energy balance in a soybean canopy with SHAW and RZ-SHAW models

Authors

Submitted to: Transactions of the ASABE
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: December 21, 2011
Publication Date: February 5, 2012
Citation: Ma, L., Flerchinger, G.N., Ahuja, L.R., Sauer, T.J., Prueger, J.H., Malone, R.W., Hatfield, J.L. 2012. Simulating the surface energy balance in a soybean canopy with SHAW and RZ-SHAW models. Transactions of the ASABE. 55(1):175-179.

Interpretive Summary: Correct simulation of surface energy balance in a crop canopy is critical for better understanding of soil water balance, canopy and soil temperature, plant water stress, and plant growth. One existing effort is to incorporate the surface energy balance in the Simultaneous Heat And Water (SHAW) into the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM). In this study, an improved version of RZ-SHAW hybrid model was tested for a soybean canopy for energy balance components (net radiation, sensible heat, latent heat, and ground heat flux), canopy and soil temperature, evapotranspiration (ET), and soil water content against measured data and against predictions of the original SHAW model. In terms of root mean squared error (RMSE), Both RZ-SHAW and SHAW simulated net radiation, sensible heat, and latent heat well. However, the ground heat flux simulated by RZ-SHAW was slightly worse with RMSE of 28.9 W m-2 compared to 22.6 W m-2 for SHAW, which could be due to difference in evaporation simulations. Simulated soil temperature at both 1.5 cm and 4.5 cm by RZ-SHAW was comparable to that of SHAW with RMSE of 2.18 oC and 2.23 oC, respectively, compared to 2.13 oC and 2.20 oC by SHAW. Similarly, simulated canopy temperature was essentially the same with RMSE of 1.77 oC by RZ-SHAW and 1.69 oC by SHAW. Simulated surface soil water was reasonable for both models. Simulated ET had a RMSE of 0.069 cm d-1 by RZ-SHAW and 0.074 cm d-1 by SHAW. However, we had to increase the minimum soil water suction for plant water uptake from 1500 kPa to 3500 kPa to meet transpiration demand during dry soil conditions. The evaluated RZ-SHAW can be used as a new tool to better simulate soil-crop water conditions by providing complete energy balance and canopy temperature.

Technical Abstract: Correct simulation of surface energy balance in a crop canopy is critical for better understanding of soil water balance, canopy and soil temperature, plant water stress, and plant growth. One existing effort is to incorporate the surface energy balance in the Simultaneous Heat And Water (SHAW) into the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM). In this study, an improved version of RZ-SHAW hybrid model was tested for a soybean canopy for energy balance components (net radiation, sensible heat, latent heat, and ground heat flux), canopy and soil temperature, evapotranspiration (ET), and soil water content against measured data and against predictions of the original SHAW model. In terms of root mean squared error (RMSE), both RZ-SHAW and SHAW simulated net radiation, sensible heat, and latent heat well. However, the ground heat flux simulated by RZ-SHAW was slightly worse with RMSE of 28.9 W m-2 compared to 22.6 W m-2 for SHAW, which could be due to difference in evaporation simulations. Simulated soil temperature at both 1.5 cm and 4.5 cm by RZ-SHAW was comparable to that of SHAW with RMSE of 2.18 oC and 2.23 oC, respectively, compared to 2.13 oC and 2.20 oC by SHAW. Similarly, simulated canopy temperature was essentially the same with RMSE of 1.77 oC by RZ-SHAW and 1.69 oC by SHAW. Simulated surface soil water was reasonable for both models. Simulated ET had a RMSE of 0.069 cm d-1 by RZ-SHAW and 0.074 cm d-1 by SHAW. However, we had to increase the minimum soil water suction for plant water uptake from 1500 kPa to 3500 kPa to meet transpiration demand during dry soil conditions. The evaluated RZ-SHAW can be used as a new tool to better simulate soil-crop water conditions by providing complete energy balance and canopy temperature.

   

 
Project Team
Ma, Liwang
Ahuja, Lajpat - Laj
Ascough, James
McMaster, Gregory - Greg
Green, Timothy
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Water Availability and Water Management (211)
  Agricultural System Competitiveness and Sustainability (216)
 
Related Projects
   DEVELOP KNOWLEDGE BASE AND QUANTITATIVE TOOLS FOR OPTIMAL CROPS AND MGMT PRACTICES FOR VARIABLE LTD WATER CONDITIONS IN THE GREAT PLAINS
   RESEARCH AND MODIFY RZWQM2 MODEL FOR SIMULATING PESTICIDE TRANSPORT AND FATE IN SURFACE WATER FROM CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL FIELDS
   ENHANCED SYSTEM MODELS, MANAGEMENT AND CULTIVAR ADAPTATIONS TO LIMITED WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, AND TOOLS FOR PRECISION MANAGEMENT
 
 
Last Modified: 05/24/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House