Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: MANAGING FORAGE AND GRAZING LANDS FOR MULTIPLE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Location: Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research

Title: Evaluating watershed-scale effects of agricultural land use and best management practices on water quality in the Spring Creek Watershed

Authors
item Piechnik, Denise -
item Goslee, Sarah

Submitted to: US-International Association for Landscape Ecology
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: January 15, 2011
Publication Date: April 3, 2011
Citation: Piechnik, D.A., Goslee, S.C. 2011. Evaluating watershed-scale effects of agricultural land use and best management practices on water quality in the Spring Creek Watershed [abstract]. US-International Association for Landscape Ecology. Paper No. 193.

Interpretive Summary: An interpretive summary is not required.

Technical Abstract: Landscape changes complicate assessing improvements in water quality due to conservation-based agricultural best management practices (BMPs) such as cattle crossings and buffer strips. Water quality was monitored before and after BMP installation in the Spring Creek Watershed (Centre Co. PA, Chesapeake Bay Watershed). Conservation BMPs were applied to 91% and 61% of the agricultural streambank within two subwatersheds (BMP1 and BMP2). A forested reference subwatershed (REF) remained unmodified. Land use determined from 2006 digital photography was 30% agriculture, 40% forested, and 30% developed. The effects of BMPs on water quality were evaluated using a hierarchical generalized linear modeling approach. Potential causal factors (land use, area of drainage, soil type, and presence of BMPs) that provided the best fitting models to the water quality response variables (N, P, pH, temperature, total suspended solids, and storm discharge) were determined at multiple scales: watershed, subwatershed, and reach. BMPs did not predict nutrient concentrations despite reducing overall sediment. Drainage area at the stream reach and the subwatershed scales was significantly related to water quality. Land use and soil type were uninformative. Evaluating water quality at the watershed scale requires correction for emergent effects of land use change.

   

 
Project Team
Skinner, Robert - Howard
Soder, Kathy
Goslee, Sarah
Adler, Paul
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Food Animal Production (101)
  Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems (215)
  Bioenergy (213)
 
Related Projects
   PASTURELAND CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT LITERATURE SYNTHESEIS
   CONSERVATION PRACTICES IN NORTHEASTERN GRAZING LANDS
   U.S. NATIVE GRASS BREEDING CONSORTIUM TO IDENTIFY REGIONAL OPTIMUM BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY ON MARGINAL LAND
   MECHANISTIC MODELING OF MULTISPECIES PASTURE GROWTH AND MANAGEMENT
   INTEGRATED PASTURE-CROP ROTATION
   GRAZINGLAND CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT
   GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND NITRATE LOSSES FROM ORGANIC SOILS IN DAIRY FARMING SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN GERMANY
   REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF BIOFUEL AND FORAGE SPECIES
   IMPACT OF CONSERVATION PRACTICES ON NUTRIENT TRANSPORT AND FATE IN PASTURE SYSTEMS
   REGIONAL CORN STOVER REMOVAL IMPACT STUDY - AMES (II)
   ASSISTING ORGANIC DAIRY PRODUCERS TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF NEW AND EMERGING MILK MARKETS
   GRAZING LANDS CEAP
   GREENHOUSE GAS LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BIOCHAR EFFECTS ON MARGINAL LAND CONVERSION TO SWITCHGRASS PRODUCTION
 
 
Last Modified: 05/21/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House