Agricultural Systems Research Unit Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
Alternative Cropping Systems
Malting Barley
Nitrate Leaching

Cover Crops
Soil Aggregation

Carbon Sequestration
Tillage/Rotation Effects
Soil Compaction
Spatial/Temporal Variability
Electrical Conductivity

Weed Seedbanks
Nitrogen Management
Site-specific Irrigation
Cercospora Biocontrol

 

Research Project: ECOLOGICALLY-SOUND PEST, WATER AND SOIL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS CROPPING SYSTEMS

Location: Agricultural Systems Research Unit

Title: Nitrogen Availability for Sugarbeet affected by Tillage System and Sprinkler Irrigation Method

Authors

Submitted to: Agronomy Journal
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: July 16, 2010
Publication Date: November 1, 2010
Repository URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/50546
Citation: Stevens, W.B., Evans, R.G., Jabro, J.D., Iversen, W.M. 2010. Nitrogen Availability for Sugarbeet affected by Tillage System and Sprinkler Irrigation Method. Agronomy Journal. 102:1745-1752.

Interpretive Summary: High fuel costs, damage to seedlings caused by wind-blown soil, and declining soil quality have increased interest in reduced tillage practices for sugarbeet. Strip tillage (ST) is a reduced tillage system that can reduce fuel and labor costs of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) production. Many shank-type ST implements band fertilizer below the seed without incorporating crop residue into the soil, potentially affecting N availability. Sprinkler irrigation method may also affect N availability due to its influence on water and NO3-N movement in soil. A field study was conducted at Sidney, MT to determine if petiole NO3-N concentration and soil available (i.e. mineral) N distribution differ under (1) conventional tillage (CT) and ST systems and (2) mid-level spray application (MESA) and low energy precision application (LEPA) irrigation methods. Petiole NO3-N concentration was lower for ST than CT for at least one sample date in two of three years and in-season available N in the top 45 cm of soil was lower with ST than with CT, particularly at sampling dates 80 DAP and earlier, in all three years. Post-harvest residual NO3-N was about 10% less with ST than with CT. Despite these differences, sugarbeet root yield and quality were similar for the two tillage systems. Plant N status and soil mineral N concentration were similar for MESA and LEPA irrigation methods. The only significant difference observed was a 10% increase in in-season soil mineral N with LEPA compared to MESA. This may be due in part to a possible reduction in NO3 leaching when LEPA, in which irrigation water is applied between alternating crop rows, is combined with strip tillage, where N is banded directly underneath the crop row. With the combination of these two systems N fertilizer is spatially separated from the downward percolating irrigation water. It was concluded that, while some differences in plant N status and soil N content were observed, these differences were not sufficient in magnitude or frequency to justify altering N application rate based on the tillage systems or irrigation methods evaluated in this study. In particular, N application rate should not be reduced with ST assuming that banding N will lead to higher N-use efficiency.

Technical Abstract: Strip tillage (ST) can reduce fuel and labor costs of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) production. Many shank-type ST implements band fertilizer below the seed without incorporating crop residue into the soil, potentially affecting N availability. Sprinkler irrigation method may also affect N availability due to its influence on water and NO3-N movement in soil. A field study was conducted at Sidney, MT to determine if petiole NO3-N concentration and soil available (i.e. mineral) N distribution differ under (1) conventional tillage (CT) and ST systems and (2) mid-level spray application (MESA) and low energy precision application (LEPA) irrigation methods. For ST, 30-cm strips spaced 60 cm apart were tilled in the fall into small grain residues with N and P banded 7.5 cm below the seed at the time of tillage. The same fertilizer materials, application rates and application timing were used in CT plots. Mid-season petiole NO3-N concentration was lower with ST than with CT in one of three years. In-season mineral N concentration in the top 45 cm of soil was lower with ST than with CT. Post-harvest mineral N was 10% lower with ST than with CT. There were few measurable effects of irrigation method except that in-season mineral N in the top 45 cm of soil was a 10% greater with LEPA than with MESA. Root yield and sugar production were reported to be similar with the two tillage systems. It was concluded that differences in petiole NO3-N concentration and soil mineral N content were not sufficient in magnitude or frequency to justify altering N application rate based on the tillage systems or irrigation methods evaluated. However, there were indications that NO3-N leaching may be reduced by combining LEPA, with which irrigation water is applied between alternating crop rows, with strip tillage, where N is banded beneath the crop row.

   

 
Project Team
Stevens, William - Bart
Allen, Brett
Jabro, Jalal "jay"
Caesar, Thecan
Lartey, Robert
Sainju, Upendra
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Water Availability and Water Management (211)
  Agricultural System Competitiveness and Sustainability (216)
 
Related Projects
   CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND NITROGEN CYCLING FOR GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION BY SOUTHEASTERN U.S. ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL ENERGY CROPS
   ACCELERATED DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL HYDROTREATED RENEWABLE JET FUEL FROM REDESIGNED OIL SEED FEEDSTOCK SUPPLY CHAINS
 
 
Last Modified: 06/20/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House