Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: MANAGING FORAGE AND GRAZING LANDS FOR MULTIPLE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Location: Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research

Title: Landscape context and plant community composition in grazed agricultural systems

Authors

Submitted to: Meeting Abstract
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: January 25, 2010
Publication Date: April 9, 2010
Citation: Goslee, S.C., Sanderson, M.A. 2010. Landscape context and plant community composition in grazed agricultural systems [abstract]. US-IALE Annual Symposium. CDROM Paper No. 80.

Interpretive Summary: An interpretive summary is not required.

Technical Abstract: Temperate humid grazinglands are an important component of the landscape of the northeastern Unites States. Grass-based agriculture is a major contributor to the economy of this region, but little is known about the basic ecology of these grazinglands. During an eight-year survey of 28 farms across the northeastern United States, we sampled the vegetation on 95 modified Whittaker plots in grazed pastures, and collected data on topography, climate and soils at each site. Surrounding land use and landscape metrics were calculated from the NLCD 2001 within circles of six radii (250 - 2000 m) surrounding each sampling site. Plant species diversity was divided into planned (forage) species and associated (nonforage) species. Composition of forage species was not strongly related to environmental factors or landscape context, while composition of nonforage species was influenced by elements from all classes of explanatory variables, particularly the presence of species in 1000-m2 plots. The lower variability in the forage species pool and the management applied to forage species and only incidentally to nonforage species probably explains the differences in responses of the two groups of species. Seed dispersal pathways may contribute to differences between the two groups. Site management for forage species overwhelms the role of landscape context for this group, but site management alone does not explain all variability in plant species composition. Landscape management, biodiversity management and land use planning must consider pastures as functional plant communities, part of the interconnected regional landscape.

   

 
Project Team
Skinner, Robert - Howard
Soder, Kathy
Goslee, Sarah
Adler, Paul
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Bioenergy (213)
  Food Animal Production (101)
  Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems (215)
 
Related Projects
   PASTURELAND CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT LITERATURE SYNTHESEIS
   CONSERVATION PRACTICES IN NORTHEASTERN GRAZING LANDS
   U.S. NATIVE GRASS BREEDING CONSORTIUM TO IDENTIFY REGIONAL OPTIMUM BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY ON MARGINAL LAND
   MECHANISTIC MODELING OF MULTISPECIES PASTURE GROWTH AND MANAGEMENT
   INTEGRATED PASTURE-CROP ROTATION
   GRAZINGLAND CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT
   GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND NITRATE LOSSES FROM ORGANIC SOILS IN DAIRY FARMING SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN GERMANY
   REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF BIOFUEL AND FORAGE SPECIES
   IMPACT OF CONSERVATION PRACTICES ON NUTRIENT TRANSPORT AND FATE IN PASTURE SYSTEMS
   REGIONAL CORN STOVER REMOVAL IMPACT STUDY - AMES (II)
   ASSISTING ORGANIC DAIRY PRODUCERS TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF NEW AND EMERGING MILK MARKETS
   GRAZING LANDS CEAP
   GREENHOUSE GAS LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BIOCHAR EFFECTS ON MARGINAL LAND CONVERSION TO SWITCHGRASS PRODUCTION
 
 
Last Modified: 05/26/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House