Food Composition and Methods Development Lab Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: FINGERPRINTING AND PROFILING METHODS FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF FOODS AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS

Location: Food Composition and Methods Development Lab

Title: A statistical evaluation of spectral fingerprinting methods using analysis of variance and principal component analysis

Authors

Submitted to: Food Chemistry
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: December 16, 2010
Publication Date: March 1, 2011
Citation: Luthria, D.L., Mukhopadhyay, S., Lin, L., Harnly, J.M. 2011. A statistical evaluation of spectral fingerprinting methods using analysis of variance and principal component analysis. Food Chemistry. 65:80-85.

Interpretive Summary: Genetics and growing conditions can lead to chemical differences in the same plant materials. A comparison of different spectral fingerprinting procedures is described that allows rapid classification of broccoli samples grown under different conditions. Spectral fingerprints were acquired for finely-powdered solid samples using Fourier transform-infrared (IR) and Fourier transform-near infrared (NIR) spectrometry and for aqueous methanol extracts of the powders (without prior separation) using molecular absorption in the ultraviolet (UV) and visible (Vis) regions and mass spectrometry with negative (MS-) and positive (MS+) ionization. The fingerprints were analyzed using nested, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis (PCA) to statistically evaluate the quality of discrimination. All 6 methods showed statistically significant differences between the cultivars and treatments. These spectral fingerprinting tools will prove useful to analytical chemists in comparing and classifying plant materials.

Technical Abstract: Six methods were compared with respect to spectral fingerprinting of a well-characterized series of broccoli samples. Spectral fingerprints were acquired for finely-powdered solid samples using Fourier transform-infrared (IR) and Fourier transform-near infrared (NIR) spectrometry and for aqueous methanol extracts of the powders (without prior separation) using molecular absorption in the ultraviolet (UV) and visible (Vis) regions and mass spectrometry with negative (MS-) and positive (MS+) ionization. The fingerprints were analyzed using nested, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis (PCA) to statistically evaluate the quality of discrimination. All 6 methods showed statistically significant differences between the cultivars and treatments. The significance of the statistical tests was improved by the judicious selection of spectral regions (IR and NIR), masses (MS+ and MS-), and derivatives (IR, NIR, UV, and Vis). In general, UV and VIS provided the lowest relative variance for analytical uncertainty and the largest F- and t-values for nested, one-way ANOVA and PCA, respectively.

   

 
Project Team
Harnly, James - Jim
Byrdwell, W Craig
Chen, Pei
Luthria, Devanand - Dave
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Human Nutrition (107)
 
Related Projects
   PATTERN RECOGNITION FOR FOODS AND SUPPLEMENTS
   OPTIMIZATION OF SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR ANALYSES OF PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS FROM DIFFERENT MATRICES
   WHOLE GRAINS: PROCESSING, FIBER, COLOR, AND PHYTONUTRIENTS
   DEVELOPMENT OF SPECTRAL FINGERPRINTING METHODS FOR RAPID CHARACTERIZATION AND AUTHENTICATION OF BOTANICAL DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS
   ASSAY OF BIOACTIVE PHYTOCHEMICALS FROM FOODS AND FOOD PRODUCTS
   DNA BARCODES/FINGERPRINTS, CHEMICAL FINGERPRINTS, AND METABOLOMIC PROFILES FOR BOTANICAL SUPPLEMENTS
   METABOLOMIC METHODS FOR PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIMENS
 
 
Last Modified: 05/22/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House