Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
 
Programs and Projects
Subjects of Investigation
 

Research Project: MANAGING FORAGE AND GRAZING LANDS FOR MULTIPLE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

Location: Pasture Systems & Watershed Management Research

Title: Performance of Forage Mixtures Constructed to Fulfill Multiple Functional Roles

Authors
item Skinner, Robert
item Goslee, Sarah
item Comas, Louise - PENN STATE UNIV

Submitted to: ASA-CSSA-SSSA Annual Meeting Abstracts
Publication Type: Abstract Only
Publication Acceptance Date: March 24, 2008
Publication Date: October 5, 2008
Citation: Skinner, R.H., Goslee, S.C., Comas, L. 2008. Performance of forage mixtures constructed to fulfill multiple functional roles. Agronomy Abstracts. p. 1 CDROM

Interpretive Summary: An interpretive summary is not required.

Technical Abstract: Ecological theory predicts that complex pasture communities that include numerous plant functional types should be more productive, stable, and better at excluding weeds than simple communities with few functional types. In a series of greenhouse and field studies, six unique functional attributes contributing to forage productivity were identified and 23 temperate pasture species were screened for their ability to perform each function. These functions included, 1) early-spring growth, 2) late-spring growth, 3) summer growth and drought resistance, 4) fall growth, 5) lack of sensitivity to low fertilizer N inputs (mainly through N fixation), and 6) ability to spread and colonize bare soil. In a follow-up field study, 14 of the species were sown as monocultures or combined into six 2-species mixtures, five 3-species mixtures, six 4-species mixtures, and five 6-species mixtures. Nested within each level of species complexity were varying levels of functional complexity including mixtures that maximized the number of positive functional attributes and mixtures that were designed to include species that performed poorly in fulfilling the identified functions. Plots were planted in the fall of 2004, then grazed by beef cattle four or five times per year in 2005, 2006, and 2007. This presentation will focus on annual yield and weed exclusion data and will discuss results in light of the following hypotheses: 1) inclusion of more functional attributes (rather than more species) and redundancy in these functional attributes among species increases seasonal evenness as well as total plant production; 2) functional attributes of species and redundancies among species are additive and the negative tradeoffs of these attributes are subtractive; 3) the increase in plant productivity over a greater portion of the season minimizes invasion success of non-desirable species.

   

 
Project Team
Skinner, Robert - Howard
Soder, Kathy
Goslee, Sarah
Adler, Paul
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Food Animal Production (101)
  Pasture, Forage and Rangeland Systems (215)
  Bioenergy (213)
 
Related Projects
   PASTURELAND CONSERVATION EFFECTS ASSESSMENT PROJECT LITERATURE SYNTHESEIS
   CONSERVATION PRACTICES IN NORTHEASTERN GRAZING LANDS
   MECHANISTIC MODELING OF MULTISPECIES PASTURE GROWTH AND MANAGEMENT
   INTEGRATED PASTURE-CROP ROTATION
   GRAZINGLAND CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT
   GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND NITRATE LOSSES FROM ORGANIC SOILS IN DAIRY FARMING SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN GERMANY
   REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF BIOFUEL AND FORAGE SPECIES
   IMPACT OF CONSERVATION PRACTICES ON NUTRIENT TRANSPORT AND FATE IN PASTURE SYSTEMS
   REGIONAL CORN STOVER REMOVAL IMPACT STUDY - AMES (II)
   ASSISTING ORGANIC DAIRY PRODUCERS TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF NEW AND EMERGING MILK MARKETS
   GRAZING LANDS CEAP
   GREENHOUSE GAS LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BIOCHAR EFFECTS ON MARGINAL LAND CONVERSION TO SWITCHGRASS PRODUCTION
 
 
Last Modified: 06/20/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House