Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
Educational Resources
Outreach Activities
National Agricultural Library
Archives
Publications
Manuscripts (TEKTRAN)
Software
Datasets
Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Reference Guide
 




Older men don't burn as many calories after overeating as their younger counterparts, so they may have to compensate by doing a little more exercise--such as taking a walk after dinner. Earlier studies have implied that aging hampered the body's ability to increase its resting metabolic rate--the energy needed to keep the resting body functioning--and thus "waste" the extra calories. So researchers tested the thesis by feeding a small group of men in their 60s and 70s and another group in their 20s an extra 1,000 calories a day for three weeks. Both age groups had an increase in metabolic rate, but the older group had a smaller increase, the researchers reported in the Journal of Gerontology. The difference amounted to about 87 calories a day that the older group would store as fat if they didn't increase their exercise. That adds up to an extra 2.2 pounds per year or 22 pounds a decade, the researchers estimate. On any given day, people may fluctuate between eating 500 to 1,000 calories more or less than needed. So the men's ability to "save" calories in times of scarcity was also tested by giving them 750 calories less than needed to maintain weight for three weeks. In this case, both groups decreased their metabolic rate about the same. Earlier, the researchers reported that the young group automatically reduced their calorie intake after the overeating period, whereas the older group continued to overeat. Taken together, the findings help explain why body fat creeps up in older men.
Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts, Boston, MA
Susan Roberts/Paul Fuss, (617) 556-3237
A genetic variation that may increase the risk of osteoporosis can be counteracted by raising calcium intake, according to a study of 60 women. When the intake was 1,500 milligrams a day, the 26 women who had the genetic variant absorbed just as much calcium as the 34 women with a normal gene. But when calcium intake was reduced to less than 300 mg/day, those with the variant absorbed significantly less. That's because intestinal cells have to actively pump in the calcium when the supply is scarce rather than letting it seep in when there's plenty. And active absorption requires vitamin D and a functional vitamin D receptor--a molecule that sits at the surface of cells and hooks up with the vitamin to activate the process. The "osteoporosis gene," discovered in 1994 by an Australian scientist, is a variation of the vitamin D receptor gene, which apparently renders the vitamin D receptor less efficient. The findings are consistent with earlier results in this laboratory showing that the association between the "osteoporosis gene" and hip bone loss depended on the calcium intake level. And it may explain why some studies have seen a relationship between the genetic variation and bone mineral density while others have not.
Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts, Boston, MA
Bess Dawson-Hughes, (617) 556-3064
For more information visit ARS Nutrition Briefs

Last updated: July 10, 1996
Return to: Quarterly Report Table of Contents
     
Last Modified: 02/11/2002
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House