|
Milling Industry Works To Reduce Reliance on Methyl
Bromide
Remember watching Grandma steadily turn the crank on the
flour sifter as she made the pumpkin pies for Thanksgiving? Ever think
about why she was sifting the flour for the pie crust?
"She was making sure that only flour, and no insects, went
into those pies," says Jim Bair, vice president of Millers' National
Federation. "We in the milling industry are also concerned with quality.
Our aim is to produce wholesome food products in a sanitary
environment."
And with the help of methyl bromide, the milling industry has been
doing that for years. Compared to other users in the agricultural sector,
the milling industry is one of the smallest users of methyl bromide. But
that use is a vital one, and in just a short time, methyl bromide will no
longer be available.
"For years we've been trying to reduce our reliance on methyl bromide,"
Bair comments. "We use this chemical, which never touches our wheat or
flour, to fumigate our milling structures with the idea that it's better
to kill the pest before it reaches our products. And, we use only a
fraction of what we're allowed to use. Although we've tried heat,
CO2, phosphine, and a combination of alternatives, we've found
no single replacement that works as effectively as methyl bromide. This
chemical allows the milling industry to comply with the Food and Drug Administration's
(FDA) stringent regulations that mandate the sanitary conditions to
ensure U.S. consumers wholesome, insect-free flour."
Insects can enter the mill in different ways, one of which is to come
in with the grain.
But, Wendell Burkholder (ARS-Madison, Wisconsin) along with scientists
from the University of Texas and Biotect, Inc., developed and patented a
technique to detect insects in grain. This test can not only find live or
dead insects, but can also detect insect fragments. The Millers' National
Federation financed a grant to the University of Texas to support this
effort. The test—which is close to commercialization—will, for the first
time, allow millers to test grain before it reaches the mill. Millers now
buy grain that gets dumped from railcars, hauled to grain elevators, and
conveyed to the mill. If an insect is discovered at the mill, it would
create difficulties. The new scientifically based ELISA (enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay) test allows millers to use a probe on the grain to
check for insect infestation while it is still in the railcar. The test
works on a variety of grain and milled grain products, including wheat,
rice, barley, oats, and corn.
"If the miller finds insects at the railcar site, then the
grain can be rejected," Bair says. "This puts the responsibility of
keeping grain free of pests with the grain shipper and ultimately, the
producer, who can do it more effectively and
economically."
The milling industry, USDA, and universities recently completed a major
study to compare this new test with current methods used by USDA
inspectors (and sanctioned by FDA) in which the inspectors take a sample
of grain, put it under a microscope, and count the number of insect
fragments found in the sample.
How a Mill Is Fumigated
Methyl bromide is used to fumigate
the
physical structure of a mill and the equipment used in processing grain
into flour. Fumigation is usually done twice a year, over a 3-day weekend
to minimize downtime. Before the process begins, the flow of wheat from
the storage facility to the mill is cut off. All grain residues are
cleaned from milling equipment, which is left open for maximum exposure to
methyl bromide. Since dust and grain particles affect the effectiveness
of the treatment, the mill is thoroughly cleaned. Empty bins and bulk
storages are also treated. At this point, no one is allowed in the
building other than those applying the chemical. The building is then
sealed to prevent escape of the methyl bromide.
"Only outside contractors or mill employees who are trained, certified,
and licensed can apply the methyl bromide," Bair says. "Although EPA
authorizes use up to 6.0 pounds per 1,000 cubic feet, we normally use only
l to l.5 pounds per 1,000 cubic feet, depending on the tightness and
structural integrity of the building. An average flour mill contains
between 1.5 million and 2 million cubic feet."
The methyl bromide
gas is held in the mill for 24 hours, when certified personnel enter to
begin the aeration process. Only after the air has been tested to ensure
safety are workers allowed to enter the mill to remove the sealants and
ready equipment and the mill for normal operation. After startup,
flour milled in the first 30 to 60 minutes is diverted into byproduct
storage. This ensures that any residue which might linger in the
equipment is not destined for human consumption.
Other Alternatives
High heat treatments have shown
promise as an alternative to methyl bromide fumigation in certain
facilities, Bair reports. But, some of the flour mills in the Untied
States are more than 100 years old. Some of these mills are not
structurally tight enough to effectively withstand raising and holding the
temperature at high levels. Neither do they have the heating capacity to
raise the temperature to levels that would kill insects.
"These old buildings have a lot of life left in them and it
just isn't economically feasible to tear them down and build new
structures that might tolerate high heat treatments or other potential
alternatives," he says. "Also, it would cost a great deal to outfit one
of these mills for heat treatments."
And although
phosphine effectively treats stored grain, empty bulk storages, and grain
and flour transport vehicles, there are technical problems with using it
to fumigate mill structures. This is due, primarily, to the extensive
electrical equipment necessarily present in the mill. Phosphine is highly
corrosive and could possibly damage this equipment. Betsy Faga,
president of the American Corn Millers Federation, agrees with Bair. "Our
industries are similar. Corn dry milling is done in structures similar to
flour mills. We, too, have tried heat, phosphine, and other combinations
and have yet to find anything that works as well as methyl bromide without
leaving any residue. And, we're also governed by phytosanitary standards
set by the FDA." "The milling industry believes that we must have
an effective integrated pest management system to ensure that consumers
get the safe, high-quality products they demand. But, with the
final ban on methyl bromide only a short time away, there isn't much time
to get that system in place," Bair says.
[October 1997 Table of Contents] [Newsletter Issues
Listing] [Methyl
Bromide Home Page] [ARS Home
Page] [USDA Home
Page]
Last Updated: October 22,
1997 |
|
|