
Loss of Methyl Bromide: The USDA Forest Service
Perspective
Research conducted by USDA's Forest Service, combined
with the efforts of cooperators and the insight of nursery managers, could
help develop integrated pest management programs that will be needed when
methyl bromide is no longer available.
The impending loss of this chemical and the major concerns expressed
by various commodity groups, including ornamental and forest nurseries,
have underscored the heavy reliance on methyl bromide to provide
broad-spectrum control for pest problems.
"The potential loss of methyl bromide has emphasized the need
for a better understanding of the pest problems that affect forest tree
nursery production in the United States and for the development of
alternative strategies to prevent and control these problems," says
Jerry Sesco, the Forest Service (FS) deputy chief for research.
Many nursery managers presently rely on routine fumigation with
methyl bromide because of its broad-spectrum ability to control diseases,
nematodes, insects, and weeds that can affect seedling production and
quality, according to Sesco. A basic lack of understanding of how pest
problems develop, uncertainty about the potential impactof certain pests
on seedling production, and an inability to prevent and control pests
through alternative practices essentially mean that fumigation is
currently the nursery manager's best "Insurance policy" against
potential problems.
"We're aggressively seeking to develop better integrated pest
management programs that will provide nursery managers with the necessary
information to manage complex pest problems through alternative chemical,
cultural, physical, and biological cotrol practices," Sesco reports.
"Our goal is to provide nursery managers with the best information
possible to manage potential pests."
To accomplish this, the Forest Service is supporting research efforts
at its laboratories in Athens, GA, and St. Paul, MN. In addition to the
Forest Service's State and Private Forestry and National Forest System,
cooperators include USDA's Agricultural Research Service, State natural
resources agencies, universities, and commercial and industrial nurseries.
Research collaborators are investigating alternative pest management
practices and collecting information that will be used in developing
integrated pest management (IPM) programs. Research efforts
include collecting information on factors that influence pest outbreaks
and developing alternative pest management strategies to prevent and
control losses.
"Our strategy has been to focus on developing both short- and
long-term IPM systems," says Stephen W. Fraedrich. An FS plant
pathologist at the Southern Forest Experiment Station in Athens, GA, he
and colleague L. David Dwinell are working with plant pathologists
Jennifer Juzwik and Cynthia M. Ocamb, who are located at the FS North
Central Forest Experiment Station in St. Paul, MN.
"In the short term, it is imperative that IPM systems are
developed which will minimize or prevent the disruption to U.S. forest
tree nursery operations because of the loss of methyl bromide,"
Fraedrich says. "Therefore, we're placing greater emphasis on the use
and application of other soil fumigants as well as other pesticides for
these short-term systems.
However, because of increasing public attention to environmental and
health issues, there are likely to be increasing challenges to using other
chemicals in the future. For the longer term, we're working to develop
cultural, physical, and biological pest management strategies as well as a
better understanding of precisely when specific chemicals are
needed."
In St. Paul, Juzwik and colleagues have refined application
methodology of the chemical dazomet, enhancing its efficacy for field soil
sterilization and control of root diseases in conifer seedlings.
"Root diseases caused by fungi such as Cylindrocladium
spp., Fusarum spp. and Pythium spp. are a major problem
facing forest nurseries," explains Juzwik. "In trials in the
North Central States we've found dazomet as effective as methyl bromide in
controlling root diseases, with no harmful effects on seedling
quality." She and colleagues will work with Fraedrich and Dwinell
from the Athens lab to refine techniques for use of dazomet in southern
nurseries beginning this fall.
Researchers at the St. Paul station have extensively screened
potential biological control agents to suppress the pathogenic soilborne
fungi.
"Preliminary studies showed that applying selected bacteria,
along with ectomycorrhizal fungi, protects containerized seedlings against
various Fusarium fungi," Juzwik says. "We're also
conducting bareroot nursery field trials with these same antagonistic,
beneficial microorganisms."
Scientists at the Athens lab are studying seedborne fungi and their
possible role in disease development in nurseries. Seed orchard and cone
harvesting conditions are being studied because they may influence the
establishment of pathogenic fungi with seeds. They're also evaluating the
efficacy of a nonpathogenic bacterium, Burkholderia cepacia, that
is reportedly antagonistic to some plant pathogenic fungi.
At both locations, FS scientists are examining ways to disinfest the
surface of seeds with chemicals such as hydrogen peroxide as well as
investigating potential biocontrol agents to suppress seedborne pathogens.
Efforts are also under way at both locations to determine the
underlying causes of disease development. "Studies done in Georgia
show that seedling quality was increased in some nursery beds by
fumigation," explains Fraedrich. "But in other beds, we've
observed no differences in seedling quality in fumigated and nonfumigated
treatments. We want to know why certain fields remain productive without
fumigation, while seedling quality is reduced and mortality increased in
other nonfumigated fields."
The impact of fungi and nematodes on seedling production is of particular interest, he says.
"In the North Central States,
soil-water management is critical in controlling root diseases,"
reports Juzwik. "Maintaining optimal soil moisture is a key factor in
minimizing Fusarium losses in both fumigated and nonfumigated nursery
beds."
"We have also examined the effect of bare-fallowing, which can
control disease losses in the Pacific Northwest nurseries," she
continues. "But we have found that this practice is not effective for
the control of root diseases in the North Central States."
Future research efforts by the Forest Service will include
assessments of
- soil solarization
- the impact of cover crops and organic amendments on soilborne pests
such as nematodes and pathogenic fungi
- efficacy studies of other possible chemicals
- factors that influence the development
of pest problems
- various combinations of chemical, cultural, physical, and biological
pest control strategies.
Even if a single chemical alternative is found to replace methyl
bromide, a more integrated approach for managing pests over the long term
is needed because of increasing environmental and human health concerns
about chemical use. Resourceful forest managers working with research
organizations, including FS scientists, could help the industry
live without methyl bromide.
[July 1996
Table of Contents]
[Newsletter
Issues
Listing]
[Methyl Bromide Home
Page]
[ARS Home Page]
[USDA Home Page]
Last Updated: October 23, 1996
|
|
|