|
From the Acting Deputy Under Secretary for Research,
Education, and
Economics
As you may know, last year the U.S.-Israel Science and Technology
Foundation made funds available for research and development of methyl
bromide alternatives, emissions reduction, and improved ways to apply the
chemical. We sent out a formal request for proposals with a submission
deadline of December 31, 1996.
The Board of Directors of the Foundation is happy to announce that the
following three proposals have been selected for funding:
Reducing Methyl Bromide Emission During Soil Fumigation by Using
Virtually Impermeable Films and Improved Delivery. Companies: Plastopil
Hazorea (Israel) and Tri-Cal, Inc. (U.S.A.) By using gas-tight films,
improved delivery technology, and reduced dosages of methyl bromide, this
project seeks to produce a new soil fumigation package that will improve
environmental quality. Research should improve trade benefits of the U.S.
and Israel as well as provide an economic package to farmers.
Developing Alternative Fumigation Systems and Methods to Reduce
Methyl Bromide Emission in Postharvest Treatments. Companies:
Haogenplast, Ltd. (Israel) and GrainPro, Inc. (U.S.A.). In addition
to improving technologies that will ensure gas-tightness to reduce dosage
levels of methyl bromide, this proposal will combine MeBr treatments with
CO2. Thus insect control can be achieved at lower methyl
bromide concentrations. This approach is expected to reduce emissions
from structural fumigations by 75 percent.
Methyl Bromide Alternatives: Development of Biocontrol Agents for
the Control of Soilborne Plant Pathogens and Nematodes. Companies:
Mycontrol Ltd. (Israel) and Thermo Trilogy Corp. (U.S.A.) By
controlling and preventing damage caused by soilborne pathogens and
nematodes, this group expects to enhance plant growth and yield. Novel
and inexpensive preparations of biocontrol agents will be developed from
Trichoderma or other microorganisms supplied by Mycontrol and
Thermo Trilogy products.
These proposals bring a total of nearly $3 million to our funding
efforts to find effective alternatives to methyl bromide. A plan to
commercialize research results from these proposals is required to be in
place within 48 months from the beginning of the projects.
Floyd P. Horn Acting Deputy
Under Secretary
[July 1997 Table of Contents]
[Newsletter Issues
Listing]
[Methyl Bromide Home
Page]
[ARS Home Page]
[USDA Home Page]
Last Updated: July 17, 1997
|