|

Great Britain: Calculating the Loss of Methyl Bromide for
Nonsoil Uses
Some small companies could go out of business, reported Robert
W. Taylor. Methyl bromide is extremely important to some businesses in
the United Kingdom, and its ban will create problems in our economy. An
accelerated program, which is currently being considered by the European Union,
with a phaseout in 2001, could cause considerable trade disruption.
Taylor is an insect control specialist with the Natural Resources Institute
in Chatham, Kent, United Kingdom. He spoke at the Annual International Research
Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions in Orlando,
Florida, December 79, 1998. His research was funded by the UK Department
of the Environment, Transport, and the Regions, and the Ministry of
Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food.
According to Taylor, 40 percent of the 1.12 million pounds (approximately
500 tons) of methyl bromide used for fumigation in Great Britain goes for
nonsoil uses. Fumigation of flour mills accounts for about 38 percent of
our methyl bromide use, followed by use on commodity imports, preshipment
exports, buildings, and ships. We also use it on quarantine imports such as
timber and plant cuttings, on aircraft, and for other unspecified uses,
he said.
Taylor and economist colleagues did a cost compliance study of what effect
the loss of methyl bromide would have on these industries. They surveyed 30
pest control companies (21 responded), food manufacturers, millers, commodity
importers and exporters, government agencies, shipping agencies, museums, and
airlines. Telephone and fax were the primary means of gathering data, but
personal visits and mail were also used.
This survey produced some interesting results, Taylor said.
Our larger milling organizations and food manufacturers have already
reduced the use of methyl bromide. Improved sanitation practices and localized
pest control are the primary alternatives for mills and structures.
Sourcing of noninfested commodities from producer countries is being
targeted by larger companies. Phosphine use is being extended but its use is
constrained by low winter temperatures and a much longer exposure period.
However, no alternative fumigants are yet registered.
Taylor noted that the flour mills in Great Britain vary greatly in age and
design and in their capability to phase out methyl bromide quickly. Cost of
switching to something other than this chemical depends primarily on whether
heat is likely to be used, either alone or as part of a combination treatment.
For imported commoditiessuch as cocoa, coffee, rice, dried fruits, and
nutsprincipal problems are ineffective fumigation and commodity
management practices in producer countries. Often, refumigation of a high
proportion of these commodities, particularly cocoa, is necessary on their
arrival in the UK. Better commodity management practices in producer countries
and improved fumigations with phosphine could greatly reduce this need to
refumigate, Taylor said.
Loss of methyl bromide as a fumigant could also result in loss of some
of our export markets, he said. Some of our commodities are
exported to Australia and New Zealand where methyl bromide is specified. Plant
cuttings that we export require a phytosanitary certificate to show that they
have been treated with methyl bromide. And, we fumigate used clothing that is
primarily exported to Africa.
With the loss of methyl bromide, major pest control servicing companies that
have not yet done so will likely diversify activities. The effect of the
phaseout will depend on how dependent they are on methyl bromide.
But diversification will likely be more difficult for small pest
control companies that rely exclusively on methyl bromide. Several of these
companies indicated in our survey that their business will cease once methyl
bromide is no longer available, Taylor reported. Small commercial
companies that import chrysanthemum cuttings expect to go out of business.
Exporters of new plant varieties expect that business will be halted with some
countries when methyl bromide is no longer available.
[January 1999 Table of Contents]
[Newsletter Issues
Listing] [Methyl
Bromide Home Page]
[ARS Home Page]
[USDA Home Page]
Last Updated: January 12, 1999
|