|
Soil Bacterium Reduces Methyl Bromide
Emissions
Scientists with the
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) have found a type of
bacterium in the soil that literally eats methyl bromide and thrives on
it. Ronald S. Oremland leads this research for USGS in Menlo Park,
California.
His work was reported by colleague Tracy L. Connell at the San Diego 1997
Annual
International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and
Emissions
Reductions, November 35, 1997. "The possibility that soil bacteria
directly oxidize methyl bromide,
thereby contributing to its destruction, is generally overlooked," said
Oremland, a USGS geochemist. "This is because both methyl bromide and
chloropicrin, which is often used with methyl bromide, are potent
biocides that are presumed to kill off, or inactivate, any soil bacteria as well as
target organisms."
In lab experiments, Oremland and colleagues
isolated a pure culture of a
gram negative, motile rod-shaped bacterium from soils that had been
fumigated
with methyl bromide. They designated the bacterium as strain
IMB1. This strain of bacterium is closely related to
Rhizobium, the
species of common bacteria that converts nitrogen to a form useful in the
soil.
"We found that this new strain not only thrives on
methyl bromide, but
it can also grow by oxidizing methyl iodide, methyl chloride, methylated
amines,
acetate, and glucose," Oremland said. "In lab tests when grown on
substrates of all of these compounds, IMB1 retained its ability to break
down methyl bromide, even after being carried through two consecutive
transfers."
According to Oremland, these results mean that this bacterium could be
used
to keep methyl bromide from escaping from the soil during field
fumigations. "Our tests showed that adding cells grown from methyl
bromide or
glucose to soil dramatically increased the rate at which methyl bromide
dissipates," he said. Fumigation levels of methyl bromide were
consumed within 1 day in soils where methyl bromide-grown cells had been added and
within 2
days for soil that had been treated with glucose-grown cells. It took 7
days
for methyl bromide to disappear from unamended live soil. "We also
found that adding low levels of methyl iodide to the soil
increased the dissipation rate of methyl bromide. Apparently this
treatment
increased the numbers of bacteria like IMBl, thereby decreasing the time
that methyl bromide stayed in the soil," Oremland said. Incorporating
trimethyl-amine, a methylated amine, in the soil seemed to speed up
this
activity.
Oremland and colleagues plan field tests to see if
these measures will
eliminate methyl bromide emissions from the soil and still maintain the
efficacy
of the chemical as an agricultural fumigant. At least one industry
group thinks the new strain of bacteria might
drastically cut the amount of methyl bromide that escapes into the
air.
"We signed a cooperative research and development agreement with the
U.S. Geological Survey to further test this strain of bacterium," said Tom
Duafala. He is director of research and development of TriCal, a company
located in Hollister, California, that specializes in custom application
of soil
fumigants. Duafala said his company will provide experimental
plots to test the
following treatments or protocols: - Lower the amount of
chloropicrin from 33 percent to 2 percent, which would
mean that chloropicrin would serve as a warning agent rather than as a
fumigant.
- Add trimethylamine or a similar bacterial substrate like formate,
ammonium
formate, methanol, or methylated amines to the soil.
- Amend the soil with traces of methyl iodide and/or trimethyl-
amine prior
to fumigation with methyl bromide.
- Innoculate the soil with cultures of the new strain of bacterium
before
applying methyl bromide.
- Use a combination of the above measures.
"We hope to find a protocol or treatment that will provide a
level of
pest control conducive to the yield quantity and quality that growers
normally
get, while eliminating, or at least significantly decreasing, methyl
bromide
emissions," Duafala said. "Dr. Oremland and colleagues at the U.S.
Geological Survey are working on ways to mass produce the bacteria for
soil
application. This project looks very
promising."
[January 1998 Table of Contents] [Newsletter Issues
Listing] [Methyl
Bromide Home Page] [ARS Home
Page] [USDA Home
Page]
Last Updated: January 22, 1998
|