|
EPA and Pesticide Registration Issues
EPA is
responsible under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA) for determining that pesticides will not pose unreasonable risks
to human health or the environment when used according to label
directions. FIFRA also requires EPA to balance the risks of pesticide use
against the benefits to society and the economy when allowing a particular
use.
These registration decisions are based on EPA's review and evaluation
of test data generated by the registrant in a variety of scientific areas,
according to Paul Schuda. He is deputy director of EPA's Office of
Pesticide Programs' Policy and Special Projects Staff. These general
areas include toxicology and oncogenicity, ecological effects,
environmental fate, and residue chemistry.
EPA may require as many as 90 to 100 specific tests in all of these
areas and the manufacturer's cost for completing these tests can be up to
$10 million. Industry has estimated that the total cost of a registration
for all phases, from research and development through production, may
exceed $50 million. And it can take from 9 to 10 years. Most pesticide
registrations can cost significantly less than this, depending on their
proposed uses; for example, a proposed use on cut flowers (enclosed areas;
not food uses requiring tolerances) will probably cost less than a use
for corn or soybeans (many acres; food crops).
"And the specific scientific studies required are determined by the
proposed use of the pesticide. Furthermore, if the proposed use is on a
food crop, the registrant must petition the agency to establish a
tolerance, or maximum residue level,"Schuda explains. "Because of these
critical and sensitive cost and timing factors, the amount of data
required becomes a sensitive issue also."
Three sets of documents describing the tests are available: 40 CFR Part
158 describes which tests are required, the Pesticide Assessment
Guidelines give detailed guidance for how the tests may be performed, and
the Standard Evaluation Procedures (SEP's) describe how the scientific
reviewers at EPA evaluate test results for use in risk assessment.
"If someone wants to get a pesticide registered at EPA, the first step
should be a preregistration conference where the potential registrant
visits EPA to get the information and forms necessary to process the
application," Schuda says. "This conference informs the registrant of
scientific and technical data needed to support the registration for the
proposed specific uses, and answers questions about EPA's review and
decision-making processes."
After this conference, the registrant develops the required data and
submits it to EPA, along with an application to register the product,
draft labeling, and a tolerance petition (if the proposed use is for a
food crop). The scientific information is reviewed and sometimes
questions are raised that require the interaction and meeting of
scientific and management personnel from both parties. Additional
information may be needed, studies may need to be repeated, or additional
studies may need to be conducted and new data submitted. After issues are
resolved, the risk and benefits assessment portions of the process are
completed and forwarded to the decision maker. Keeping in mind the
proposed use of the pesticide, risk managers evaluate assessment results
and make a decision based on risks versus benefits. During the
decision-making process, EPA may require changes in proposed labeling,
uses, and application methods to mitigate risks to human health or the
environment.
Each year EPA makes a large number of various types of regulatory
decisions. In 1996, those included:
New Chemicals (active ingredients) ..................................
24
New Uses for existing chemicals .....................................
122
Old Chemicals [similar chemicals/uses ("me-too's")] ........ 912
Label Amendments .....................................................
3,290
Experimental Use Permits ...............................................
102
Special Local Needs [Section 24(c)'s] ............................
373
Emergency Exemptions [Section 18's] .............................
452
Tolerances
......................................................................
141
Total
............................................................................
5,416
An example of the magnitude of EPA's responsibilities concerning
pesticides is the 1995 figures, which indicate 610 active ingredients
currently in production and 19,000 formulated pesticide products
registered for marketing and use in the United States.
Another part of EPA's mandate is to bring the scientific databases of
registered pesticides up to current standards through the reregistration
process. As pesticides pass through this process, modifications may need
to be made to registrations, labels, and tolerances to protect human
health and the environment. This has become a very resource-intensive
undertaking. Since 1991, EPA has made Reregistration Eligibility Decisions
on 201 of the 382 chemical cases (53%), meaning that these active
ingredients may proceed through the product-specific reregistration phase
in which each formulated product is registered again according to its use.
The remaining 181 chemical cases (47%) are projected to complete product
specific registration by the year 2004.
Registration Questions: Conventional Chemicals
EPA Contact: Registration Division
(703) 305-5447
Registration Questions: Biopesticides
EPA Contact: Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division
(703) 308-8128
Registration Questions: Antimicrobials
EPA Contact: Antimicrobials Division
(703) 305-5440
[January 1997 Table of Contents]
[Newsletter Issues
Listing]
[Methyl Bromide Home
Page]
[ARS Home Page]
[USDA Home Page]
Last Updated: January 27, 1997
|