
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service USDA's
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service is charged with protecting the United States from the
introduction and establishment of exotic agricultural pests, Donald Husnik
reported at the San Diego Conference. APHIS Deputy Administrator for Plant
Protection and Quarantine, Husnik said that the agency's mission is also
to facilitate trade in the global marketplace.
Husnik said that the loss of ethylene dibromide (EDB) in the early 1980's
heightened the awareness of our increasing dependence on chemical
fumigants. And, while the loss of EDB had major repercussions on our
quarantine program, it was mitigated somewhat by knowing that we had
methyl bromide as an alternative. Since then, he said that APHIS's number one
objective has been to find alternative quarantine treatments for both EDB
and methyl bromide.
Alternatives developed by the Agricultural Research Service for
commodities that had formerly been treated with EDB and could not tolerate
methyl bromide include hot water, hot air, and cold treatments. However,
these treatments have limitations that include time, cost, and usable
temperature ranges.
"We must work together to develop treatment technologies and phytosanitary
certification systems," Husnik said. "There is a need for more dialogue
among scientists on an international level regarding standards for
quarantine security. This will lead to international acceptance of
new treatment methods and certification systems."
Without substantial progress on this interaction, the loss of methyl
bromide will put U.S. quarantine efforts, and a substantial part of our
export trade, in an extremely precarious position.
"Global trade pressures and the impending loss of methyl bromide make it
imperative that every practical treatment option be explored as quickly as
possible," Husnik stated. "The potential loss of this
chemical from the arsenal of risk management options available to plant
quarantine officials will undoubtedly have serious negative effects on
import and export programs in all countries."
Impacts from the loss of methyl bromide are expected to fall into two
categories:
- A great reduction in the number and range of treatments that can
be prescribed in advance as the basis for authorizing the import and
export of regulated materials. This will result in increased emphasis on
the pest risk analysis process to more precisely estimate risks, thereby
reducing the number of minor phytosanitary concerns.
- A serious reduction in the number and range of treatment options
available for emergency action programs based on the detection of a
pest. This affects the ability to prescribe commodity treatments
resulting from inspection at ports of entry. It also limits the
options available for emergency treatments applied for commodities
moving domestically.
Husnik said that the most serious threat to trade will be the reduction in
number and range of treatments available for emergency action programs
because of the importance currently placed on methyl bromide as an
emergency treatment. No other treatment offers the same degree of
flexibility, economy, portability, and range of applications for emergency
actions.
APHIS has placed greater emphasis and resources on exploring usable
alternatives to methyl bromide.
"We're aggressively developing a policy and operation procedures on
irradiation that establish linkage between the technology and
phytosanitary problems," Husnik reported. "We're also updating the 1989
regulation that adopted irradiation as a phytosanitary treatment to move
papayas from Hawaii to the U.S. mainland. The proposal is to allow
treatment in approved areas of the mainland and to adopt the newly
proposed generic dose of irradiation for fruit flies of concern."
Other changes that Husnik envisions with the loss of methyl bromide
include:
* Scrutinizing more carefully the tolerable level of risk for pests.
* Redesigning programs with shift toward pre-clearance and inspection
processes with tolerances.
* Increasing use of mitigation systems to achieve quarantine security
without treatment or by combining partially effective treatments with
other mitigation measures.
* Relying more heavily on overseas certification, field surveillance,
host/nonhost status, and other risk management techniques traditionally
more difficult to accept or develop.
* Redefining quarantine security more precisely and avoiding gross
judgments simply because a convenient treatment is available.
[January 1996 Table of Contents]
[Newsletter Issues
Listing]
[Methyl Bromide Home
Page]
[ARS Home Page]
[USDA Home Page]
Last Updated: October 23, 1996
|
|
|