Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
Educational Resources
Outreach Activities
National Agricultural Library
Archives
Publications
Manuscripts (TEKTRAN)
Software
Datasets
Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Reference Guide
 



Methyl Iodide: A Single Chemical Replacement for Methyl Bromide

James J. Sims, H.D. Ohr, N.M. Grech, Department of Plant Pathology; J. Ole Becker,
Department of Nematology; M.E. McGriffen, Jr., Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.

Methyl bromide is the most widely used and universally effective fumigant in the world. However, it has been subject to two major regulatory actions in the past few years. The first was the
United Nations' Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer which eliminates the use of methyl bromide in industrialized countries in 2010. Independently, the U.S. Clean Air Act will bring about a ban on production or importation in the USA after January 1, 2001. The reason for these actions is the current scientific opinion that methyl bromide emissions contribute significantly to the destruction of the ozone layer in the stratosphere.

We started this work about two years ago when we recalled that methyl iodide decomposes in light. This photolability of methyl iodide results in a very short residence time in the atmosphere of only a few days. This suggests that methyl iodide will not reach the stratosphere under normal circumstances and, therefore, will have an insignificant ozone depletion potential. The lifetime of methyl bromide in the atmosphere has been estimated to be l.5-2 years.

Both methyl iodide and methyl bromide have well known chemistry being used as alkylating agents. Because of this similarity in reactivity, one would expect that methyl iodide would replace methyl bromide as a biocide. The literature shows very clearly that both compounds are considered toxic to animals. The documented chemical reactivity of both compounds is so similar that we expected that methyl iodide should act as a drop-in replacement for methyl bromide.

When we checked the biological literature for evidence of our conjecture, we found very little. Methyl iodide was tested as a potential fumigant of insects as long as 50 years ago and was shown to have good activity in a couple of subsequent studies. No literature appears to exist describing the use of methyl iodide in soil fumigation. It is known that the activity of many fumigants can be modified by their use i soil.

One further property of methyl iodide gives it an advantage over methyl bromide. Methyl iodide is a low boiling liquid with a boiling point of 42.5 oC (108 oF) while methyl bromide is a gas at ambient temperature and pressure. The ease of handling a liquid over a gas should increase worker safety.

Our testing of methyl iodide has been in soil against a broad range of organisms. Most of the tests have been done in comparison with methyl bromide (at the same molar concentration) and no treatment as controls. The organisms tested were: the fungi Phytophthora citricola, P. Cinnamomi, P. parasitica and Rhizoctonia solani; the nematode Heterodera schachtii; and the weeds Abutilon theophrastii, Chenopodium album, C. murale, Convolvulus arvensis, Cyper us rotundus, Poa annua, Portulaca oleracea, and Sisymbrium irio. In both laboratory and field trials, when compared to equivalent molar rates, methyl iodide was equal to or better than methyl bromide in controlling the tested organisms.

Other environmental concerns are worth considering. Both chemicals have short half lives in water. Methyl bromide is hydrolyzed in 20 to 40 days and methyl iodide in 50 to 100 days.

Both are converted by this hydrolysis to methanol and, respectively, bromide ion or iodide ion. It has been estimated that methyl bromide has a half life of 14 days in the soil after a typical fumigation. This will be dependent on soil type and organic content. Some microbial consumption of methyl bromide in the soil has recently been reported. No such studies have been done for methyl iodide, but similar behavior would be expected. The fate of iodide in the environment is not well known, but unlike bromide, iodide is a recognized plant and human nutrient. The addition of iodide to salt is well known in this country. Lack of iodide is a major cause of mental illness in the world.

Based on its chemical, physical, and biological properties, methyl iodide is a logical candidate to replace methyl bromide.

[April 1996 Table of Contents] [Newsletter Issues Listing] [Methyl Bromide Home Page]
[ARS Home Page]
[USDA Home Page]

Last Updated: October 16, 1996
     
Last Modified: 01/30/2002
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House