Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
Educational Resources
Outreach Activities
National Agricultural Library
Archives
Publications
Manuscripts (TEKTRAN)
Software
Datasets
Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Reference Guide
 

Evaluation of New Canal Point Sugarcane Clones
1998-99 Harvest Season

Results and Discussion

Table 1 lists the parentage, percentage of fiber, cold tolerance ratings, and reactions to smut, rust, leaf scald, and mosaic diseases for each clone included in these experiments. Tables 2 through 5 contain the results of the CP 94 series plant-cane experiments, and tables 6 through 9 contain the results of the CP 93 series plant-cane experiments. Tables 10 through 12 contain the results of the CP 93 series first-ratoon experiments, and tables 13 and 14 contain the results of the CP 92 series first-ratoon experiments. Tables 15 through 17 contain the results of the CP 92 series second-ratoon experiments, and table 18 contains the results of the CP 91 series second-ratoon experiments. Table 19 lists the dates that stalks were counted in each experiment.

Plant-Cane Crop, CP 94 Series

When averaged across all seven farms, CP 94-1528 and CP 94-2059 yielded significantly more sugar per hectare (TS/H) than CP 70-1133 and all other new clones except CP 94-1100 (table 5). CP 94-1100 yielded significantly more TS/H than CP 70-1133 and all other new clones except CP 94-1628.

CP 94-1528 also yielded significantly more sugar per metric ton of cane (KS/T) than CP 70-1133 (table 4). The mean yield of metric tons of cane per hectare (TC/H) of CP 94-1528 was almost significantly greater than that of CP 70-1133 (table 2). At the Knight, SFCE, and SFCW locations, CP 94-1528 yielded significantly more TC/H than CP 70-1133. The stability-safety index for TS/H of CP 94-1528 was less than that of CP 70-1133 (table 5). This was due to moderate TC/H yields at some locations with organic soils and near average TC/H and KS/T yields on the sand soil at Lykes (table 2 and table 4). CP 94-1528 had a low preharvest KS/T yield, almost significantly lower than that of CP 70-1133 (table 3).

CP 94-2059 had high TC/H yields on organic soils. Its mean TC/H yield, as well as its TC/H yields at five of the six locations with organic soils, were significantly greater than the corresponding TC/H yields of CP 70-1133 (table 2). However, CP 94-2059 had low yields of KS/T. Its harvest KS/T was significantly lower than the KS/T yields of five other new clones, and its preharvest KS/T yield was significantly lower than the KS/T yields of CP 70-1133 and eight other new clones (table 3 and table 4).

CP 94-1100 yielded significantly more KS/T and almost significantly more TC/H than CP 70-1133 (table 2 and table 4). CP 94-1100 had above average yields at most locations with organic soils. However, CP 94-1100 was outstanding on the sand soil at Lykes, where it yielded significantly more TC/H and TS/H than CP 70-1133 (table 2 and table 5). The KS/T yields of CP 94-1100 were below average at Lykes, particularly its preharvest KS/T, which was significantly less than the preharvest KS/T yields of 8 of the 10 other new clones and CP 70-1133 (table 3 and table 4).

Increases of seed cane of CP 94-1528, CP 94-1100, and CP 94-1340 were begun for potential release (table 1). The TS/H yields of CP 94-1340 and CP 70-1133 were similar. However, CP 94-1528 and CP 94-1100 each yielded significantly more TS/H than CP 94-1340 (table 5). The major yield attribute of CP 94-1340 was its high preharvest and harvest yields of KS/T (table 3 and table 4).

CP 94-2059 had good cold tolerance, CP 94-1528 and CP 94-1100 had fair cold tolerance, and CP 94-1340 had poor cold tolerance (table 1). There are no serious disease concerns for any of these four new clones. However, CP 94-2059, CP 94-1528, and CP 94-1100 have low levels of susceptibility to mosaic. In addition, CP 94-1100 and CP 94-2059 have low susceptibility to leaf scald; CP 94-1528 has low susceptibility to rust; and CP 94-2059 has low susceptibility to smut. An important attribute of CP 94-1340 is that it is resistant to all four diseases listed in table 1. CP 94-1528 and CP 94-2059 had fiber percentages similar to that of CP 70-1133, whereas CP 94-1100 and CP 94-1340 had a moderately low percentage of fiber.

Plant-Cane Crop, CP 93 Series

Last year's report contained the results from five locations of the CP 93 series from the plant-cane crop (Glaz et al. 1999). This year, results are available from five additional locations (table 6, table 7, table 8, and table 9). No new clone yielded more TS/H than CP 70-1133. However, CP 93-1634, CP 93-1382, CP 93-1309, and CP 93-1065 had TS/H, TC/H, and KS/T yields similar to those of CP 70-1133 (table 6, table 8, and table 9). All four new clones except CP 93-1065 were similarly identified last year in the plant-cane crop (Glaz et al. 1999). Seed cane of all of these new clones except CP 93-1065 is being increased for potential commercial release (table 1).

First-Ratoon Crop, CP 93 Series

No new clone yielded significantly more TS/H than CP 70-1133 (table 12), although CP 93-1634 and CP 93-1596 almost did and had significantly greater TS/H yields than 7 of the 11 new clones (table 12). CP 93-1382 also had high TS/H, significantly greater than the TS/H yields of 6 new clones.

CP 93-1634 had a high mean TC/H yield, although not significantly greater than that of CP 70-1133 (table 10). CP 93-1634 and CP 70-1133 had similar yields of KS/T (table 11). CP 93-1596 yielded significantly more TC/H than CP 70-1133 (table 10), but had a low KS/T yield (table 11). CP 93-1382 did not have significantly different KS/T or TC/H yields than CP 93-1634 and CP 93-1596. However, the KS/T yields of CP 93-1382 were somewhat higher and its TC/H yields were somewhat lower than those of the other two new clones (table 10 and table 11).

Seed cane of CP 93-1634, CP 93-1309, and CP 93-1382 is being increased for potential commercial release (table 1). CP 93-1309, CP 93-1382, CP 93-1065, and CP 93-1596 had fair tolerance to cold temperatures, and CP 93-1634 had poor cold tolerance. One of the strongest characteristics of CP 93-1382 was its resistance to smut, rust, leaf scald, and mosaic. CP 93-1596's susceptibility to leaf scald and mosaic is undetermined. CP 93-1634 had low susceptibility to leaf scald and mosaic. CP 93-1309 had low susceptibility to rust and mosaic. Based on natural infection observed at Eastgate, CP 93-1065 was too susceptible to leaf scald for commercial production in Florida. All five of these new CP 93 clones had moderately low fiber percentages. The fiber percentages of CP 93-1382 and CP 93-1065 were closest to the fiber percentage of CP 70-1133. From CP 93-1634 to CP 93-1309 to CP 93-1596, the fiber percentages were progressively lower.

First-Ratoon Crop, CP 92 Series

Last year's report contained the results from the first-ratoon crop of the CP 92 series from seven locations (Glaz et al. 1999). This year, results are available from three additional locations (table 13 and table 14). When averaged across all three locations, no new clone yielded more TS/H than CP 70-1133 (table 14). CP 92-1666, CP 92-1213, and CP 92-1641 were scheduled to be released for commercial production in Florida in 1999 (table 1). CP 92-1666 and CP 92-1213 had TS/H, TC/H, and KS/T yields similar to those of CP 70-1133 (table 13 and table 14). Both new clones had significantly lower TC/H and TS/H yields than CP 70-1133 on the sand soil at Hilliard (table 14). Conversely, CP 92-1666 yielded significantly more TC/H and TS/H than CP 70-1133 on the Torry muck at Eastgate (table 14). The mean TS/H yield across all three locations for CP 92-1641 was significantly less than that of CP 70-1133 (table 14). CP 92-1641 had high KS/T yields (table 13), but low TC/H yields (table 14) at all three locations.

Second-Ratoon Crop, CP 92 Series

When averaged across all seven locations, CP 92-1666 and CP 92-1167 had significantly greater yields of TS/H than CP 70-1133 (table 17). As stated in the previous section, CP 92-1666 was scheduled for commercial release in 1999 (table 1). The high TS/H yield of CP 92-1666 was due primarily to its high TC/H yield, which was significantly greater than that of CP 70-1133 and seven other new clones of the CP 92 series (table 15). The stability-safety index for TC/H for CP 92-1666 was higher than that of any other clone. This was due to its consistently high TC/H yields at all locations except Lykes (table 15). The mean KS/T yield of CP 92-1666 was low, and almost significantly lower than that of CP 70-1133 (table 16). CP 92-1666 yielded similarly at these seven locations in the plant-cane and first-ratoon crops, with the exception that as first ratoon, it also yielded well at Lykes (Glaz et al. 1998, 1999).

CP 92-1167 had mean yields similar to those of CP 92-1666; that is, a high yield of TC/H (table 15) and a low yield of KS/T (table 16) resulting in a high TS/H yield (table 17). Although the KS/T yield of CP 92-1167 was similar to that of CP 92-1666, it was significantly less than that of CP 70-1133 (table 16). CP 92-1167 also had similar yields at these locations in the plant-cane and first-ratoon crops (Glaz et al. 1998, 1999).

CP 92-1213 and CP 92-1641 were also scheduled for commercial release in 1999 (table 1). CP 92-1213 had a mean TS/H yield similar to that of CP 92-1666, but not significantly greater than that of CP 70-1133 (table 17). The TC/H yield and KS/T yields were both lower than, but not significantly different from, those of CP 92-1666 (table 15 and table 16). The TC/H yield of CP 92-1213 was particularly low on the sand soil at Lykes (table 15). CP 92-1213 also had TC/H, KS/T, and TS/H yields similar to those of CP 70-1133 in the plant-cane and first-ratoon crops, with particularly low yields at Lykes (Glaz et al. 1998, 1999).

CP 92-1641 had a lower, but not significantly different, mean TS/H yield than CP 70-1133 (table 17). However, the mean TS/H and TC/H yields of CP 92-1666, CP 92-1167, CP 92-1213, CP 92-1561, and CP 92-1435 were significantly higher than those of CP 92-1641 (table 15 and table 17). The positive characteristic of CP 92-1641 was its KS/T, the mean yield of which was significantly greater than the KS/T yields of eight other CP 92 clones (table 16). The mean TS/H yield at these seven locations for CP 92-1641 was similar to that of CP 92-1666 in the plant-cane crop (Glaz et al. 1998). In the first-ratoon crop, the mean TS/H yield of CP 92-1641 was significantly less than that of CP 92-1666 but still similar to that of CP 92-1213 (Glaz et al. 1999).

Because of its susceptibility to sugarcane rust, CP 92-1167 is no longer being considered for commercial release (table 1). CP 92-1666, CP 92-1213, and CP 92-1641 all have low susceptibility to sugarcane rust. CP 92-1666 has an undetermined level of susceptibility to sugarcane smut, and CP 92-1641 has a low level of susceptibility to leaf scald. CP 92-1666, CP 92-1213, and CP 92-1641 all have fiber contents of about 10 percent. CP 92-1666 and CP 92-1213 have fair tolerance to cold temperatures, and CP 92-1641 has good cold tolerance.

Second-Ratoon Crop, CP 91 Series

Last year’s report described the yield results of the CP 91 series clones at seven locations in the second-ratoon crop (Glaz et al. 1999). This year, these clones were tested at Eastgate and Hilliard in the second-ratoon crop (table 18). When averaged across both locations, no clone yielded significantly more TS/H than CP 70-1133. However, CP 91-1238 had a TS/H yield significantly greater than that of CP 70-1133 at Eastgate. CP 91-1883 yielded significantly more TS/H than seven other clones at Eastgate but not significantly more than CP 70-1133. Both CP 91-1238 and CP 91-1883 had high TS/H yields in the first-ratoon crop at Eastgate last year (Glaz et al. 1999) and TS/H yields similar to the TS/H yield of CP 70-1133 in the plant-cane crop at Eastgate 2 years ago (Glaz et al. 1998).

CP 91-1238 had fair cold tolerance and CP 91-1883 had poor cold tolerance (table 1). CP 91-1238 was too susceptible to rust for commercial production in Florida, and CP 91-1883 had low levels of susceptibility to rust, leaf scald, and mosaic. CP 91-1238 had a very low fiber percentage, and CP 91-1883 was moderately low in fiber.


previous page next page 

United States Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Service

The material on this page is in the public domain.

Original posting: June 20, 2000.

     
Last Modified: 02/06/2002
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House