Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
Educational Resources
Outreach Activities
National Agricultural Library
Archives
Publications
Manuscripts (TEKTRAN)
Software
Datasets
Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Reference Guide
 

Evaluation of New Canal Point Sugarcane Clones
1998-99 Harvest Season

Introduction

Clonal selection at precommercial stages supports the commercial production of sugarcane, complex hybrids of Saccharum spp. Although production of sugar per unit area is a very important characteristic, it is not the only factor on which sugarcane is evaluated. In addition, the concentration of sugar and the fiber content of the cane are analyzed. Several of the clones with high yields of sugar per hectare identified in this report will never become commercial cultivars.

Deren et al. (1995) explain mathematically how sugar yield is not the only economic factor on which sugarcane yields are judged. The time of year and the duration that a clone yields its highest amount of sugar per unit area can be very important, since sugarcane harvest seasons extend from fall to spring. Because sugarcane is commercially grown in plant and ratoon crops, clones are evaluated accordingly. Adaptability to mechanical harvesting and mechanical seed cane cutting are important traits in Florida.

Information about the stability of a clone's performance across environments aids in selecting clones that will yield well across all environments. Stability measurements also enable identification of clones that will perform well only in some environments. This stability factor is important in our evaluations because of the wide range of environments for growing sugarcane in Florida. As differences widen for such characteristics as temperature, moisture, and soil, region-specific clones become necessary because few clones produce high yields in markedly different environments.

Clones with desired agronomic characteristics also must be productive in the presence of harmful diseases, insects, and weeds. Some pests rapidly develop new, virulent races or strains. Clonal resistance to such pathogens often changes over time, so no clone can be considered permanently resistant. The selection team must try not to discard clones that have sufficient resistance or tolerance to pests, and it must discard clones that are too susceptible to pests to be grown commercially. Sugarcane growers in Florida rely much more on tolerance than resistance to sugarcane diseases. In the 1998 growing season, not counting about 20 percent of the area for which cultivars were not specified, the top seven cultivars made up 91.9 percent of the total Florida sugarcane area (Glaz 1998). Each of these seven cultivars--CP 80-1827, CP 72-2086, CP 80-1743, CL 61-620, CP 73-1547, CP 78-1628, and CP 70-1133--was susceptible to at least one of the following sugarcane diseases: rust, mosaic, leaf scald, or smut. Glaz et al. (1986) presented a formula and procedure to help growers distribute their available sugarcane cultivars while considering possible attacks of new pests.

The disease that has caused the most difficulty in Florida in selecting resistant sugarcane cultivars is sugarcane rust, caused by Puccinia melanocephala Syd and P. Syd. The disease against which Florida sugarcane growers and scientists have had the most success in selecting resistant cultivars is sugarcane smut, caused by Ustilago scitaminea Syd and P. Syd. Other diseases with which Florida sugarcane growers must contend are leaf scald, caused by Xanthomonas albilineans (Ashby) Dow; yellow leaf syndrome, caused by a luteovirus (Lockhart et al. 1996); and sugarcane mosaic virus. Ratoon stunt disease (RSD)--caused by Clavibacter xyli subsp. xyli Davis, Gillaspie, Vidaver, and Harris--has probably been the most damaging, although the least visible, sugarcane disease in Florida. Some growers minimize losses from RSD by using hot-water treatments to obtain disease-free seed cane. Scientists at Canal Point screen clones for resistance to rust, smut, leaf scald, mosaic, RSD, and eye spot. Eye spot, caused by Bipolaris sacchari (E.J. Butler) Shoemaker, is not currently a commercial problem in Florida.

Damaging insects in Florida of long duration are the sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.); the sugarcane wireworm, Melanotus communis; and the sugarcane grub, Ligyrus subtropicus. An insect discovered in Florida in 1990, the sugarcane lace bug, Leptodictya tabida (Hall 1991), has also become a pest, selectively feeding on some clones. In 1994, another insect pest new to commercial sugarcane fields in Florida was found--the West Indian cane weevil, Metamasius hemipterus (L.) (Sosa 1995). In 1994, this weevil caused particularly severe damage to several plantings of CP 85-1382, a promising new clone described previously in this series of reports.

Geneticists at Canal Point are working to incorporate borer resistance into the breeding program by selecting for leaf pubescence (a trait known to promote resistance) in elite sugarcane clones (Sosa 1996). Currently, there are no known commercial sugarcane cultivars with pubescent leaves.

Winter freezes are common in the region of Florida where much of the sugarcane is produced. The severity and duration of a freeze and the specific sugarcane cultivar are the major factors that determine how much damage occurs. The damage caused by such freezes ranges from none to death of the mature sugarcane plant. The sugar content of these plants declines rapidly if temperatures return to normal, warmer ranges soon after the freeze. Stalk populations may decline after severe freezes kill recently planted and emerged sugarcane plants. Beginning last year, this report has included reactions of sugar content of mature sugarcane after a freeze. Updated information is included in table 1.

A new emphasis for the Canal Point genetics program is to breed and select sugarcane cultivars that will enhance sugarcane's relationship with the surrounding Everglades. Two strategies being pursued are to breed and select clones that help to reduce the phosphorus content of water discharged from Florida sugarcane farms (Glaz et al. 1997) and that will yield well in soils with higher water tables.

Each year at Canal Point, approximately 100,000 seedlings are evaluated from crosses derived from a diverse germplasm collection. [However, reports from Mangelsdorf (1983) and Deren (1995) contend that the genetic base of U.S. sugarcane breeding programs is too narrow.] This year, most of the parental clones in the Canal Point program originated from Canal Point. In addition, clones used as parents this season came from Clewiston (Florida), Louisiana, Texas, and Réunion, in the Indian Ocean. Also, several feral Saccharum officinarum and S. robustum clones and interspecific hybrids of these clones were used as parents.

About 10 percent of 100,000 seedlings from the seedling stage are advanced to stage I, whence about 10 percent of the 10,000 clones are advanced to stage II. The 1,000 clones in stage II were visually selected in the seedling and stage I phases. Once selected as seedlings, clones are vegetatively or clonally propagated. From this stage on in the selection program, all reproduction is vegetative; hence each plant (clone) is genetically identical to its precursor, assuming no mutations or the unlikely formation and germination of true seeds in our plots. From these 1,000 selected clones in stage II, about 130 are selected for continued testing in replicated experiments. The seedling stage, stage I, and stage II are each evaluated for 1 year in the plant-cane crop at the USDA Sugarcane Field Station in Canal Point. The primary selection criteria for the stage II and all subsequent stages are sugar yields, cane tonnage, and disease resistance.

The stage III clones are evaluated for 2 years in the plant-cane and first-ratoon crops at four locations, all in commercial sugarcane fields. The 11 most promising clones receive continued testing for 4 more years in the stage IV experiments reported in this annual publication. Tai and Miller (1989) also described this selection program from the seedling phase to stage IV. Clones that successfully complete these experimental phases undergo 2 to 4 years of evaluation and seed-cane increase by the Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., before commercial release. Some of this evaluation occurs concurrently with the evaluations described here.

Clones with characteristics that may be valuable for sugarcane breeding programs are identified throughout the selection process. Sugarcane geneticists in other programs often request clones from Canal Point. From May 1998 to April 1999, CP clones or seeds were requested from and sent to Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Morocco, Pakistan, Peru, and Switzerland. California, Georgia, Kansas, New York, and Texas, and five other locations in Florida, also received Canal Point clones.

The purpose of this report is to summarize the performance of the clones in the plant-cane, first-ratoon, and second-ratoon stage IV experiments in Florida's 1998-99 sugarcane harvest season.


previous page next page 

United States Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Service

The material on this page is in the public domain.

Original posting: June 20, 2000.

     
Last Modified: 02/06/2002
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House