Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
Educational Resources
Outreach Activities
National Agricultural Library
Archives
Publications
Manuscripts (TEKTRAN)
Software
Datasets
Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Reference Guide
 

Evaluation of New Canal Point Sugarcane Clones
1997-98 Harvest Season

Test Procedures

In 28 experiments, 46 new CP clones (11 clones of the CP 93 series in the plant crop, 11 clones of the CP 92 series in the plant-cane and first-ratoon crops, 12 clones of the CP 91 series in the first- and second-ratoon crops, and 12 clones of the CP 90 series in the second-ratoon crop) were evaluated at 9 farms. CP 91-2246 and CP 91-1560 were included in 9 of the 10 experiments with CP 91 series clones, and CP 91-1609 was tested at one location with CP 91 series clones. In the second-ratoon experiments of the CP 90 series clones, CP 90-1428 was planted at the two farms with organic soils and CP 90-1030 at the farm with a sand soil.

CP 70-1133 was the reference clone in all 28 experiments. It was the second most widely grown cultivar on sand soils but only a minor cultivar on organic soils in Florida. Overall, CP 70-1133 was the sixth most widely grown sugarcane cultivar in Florida (Glaz 1997).

The second-ratoon experiment at A. Duda and Sons (Duda) southeast of Belle Glade, the CP 92 series first-ratoon and the two second- ratoon experiments at Okeelanta Corporation (Okeelanta) south of South Bay, and the first-ratoon experiment at Knight Management (Knight) southwest of 20-Mile Bend were conducted on Dania muck soils. As described by McCollum et al. (1976), Dania is the shallowest of the organic soils in the Everglades agricultural area that is composed primarily of decomposed sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense Crantz). The other organic soils similar to Dania muck, listed in order of increasing depth, are Lauderhill, Pahokee, and Terra Ceia mucks.

Ten experiments were conducted on Lauderhill mucks--all three experiments planted at Sugar Farms Co-op Western Division (SFCW) east of Canal Point, all three experiments planted at Wedgworth Farms (Wedgworth) east of Belle Glade, the plant-cane and second-ratoon experiments at Knight, the first-ratoon experiment at Duda, and the CP 93 series plant-cane experiment at Okeelanta.

The two ratoon experiments at Sugar Farms Co-op Eastern Division (SFCE) near 20-Mile Bend in Palm Beach County, the plant-cane experiment at Duda, the CP 92 series plant-cane experiment at Okeelanta, and the CP 91 series first-ratoon experiment at Okeelanta were conducted on Pahokee muck soils.

The three experiments at Eastgate Farms (Eastgate) north of Belle Glade were on Torry muck. The three experiments at Hilliard Brothers' of Florida (Hilliard) west of Clewiston were on Malabar sand. The two experiments at Lykes Brothers' Farm (Lykes) near Moore Haven in Glades County were on Pompano fine sand.

The two experiments at Lykes and the CP 92 series plant-cane, the CP 91 series first-ratoon, and the CP 90 series second-ratoon experiments at Okeelanta were planted on fields in successive sugarcane rotations. The other experiments were planted in fields that had not been cropped to sugarcane for approximately 1 year. In all experiments, clones were planted with two lines of seed cane per furrow in plots arranged in randomized complete-block designs with eight replications. Each two-row plot was 10.7 m long and 3 m wide (0.0032 ha). The distance between rows was 1.5 m, and 1.5-m alleys separated the front and back ends of the plots. The margins of the experiments were protected with an extra row of sugarcane on each side (usually the same clone as planted in the adjacent plot) and an extra 1.5 m of sugarcane in the front and back.

Samples of 10 stalks per plot were cut from unburned cane from all plots in each experiment between October 6, 1997, and February 25, 1998. In all experiments, one sample was cut from the middle row of each plot. In addition, a preharvest sample was cut from two replications of seven plant-cane experiments between October 10, 1997, and October 30, 1997. For all samples, once a stool of sugarcane was chosen for cutting, the next 10 mature stalks in the row were cut as the 10-stalk sample. The range of sampling dates for each crop was as follows: October 28, 1997, to February 25, 1998, for the plant crop; November 25, 1997, to February 25, 1998, for the first-ratoon crop; and October 6, 1997, to December 19, 1997, for the second-ratoon crop. After the stalk samples were transported to the Agricultural Research Service's Sugarcane Field Station at Canal Point for weighing and milling, crusher juice samples from the stalks were analyzed for Brix and sucrose, and theoretical recoverable yields of kg 96° sugar per metric ton of cane (KS/T) were determined as a measure of sugar production. The procedure used to calculate these yields using fiber percentages is described by Legendre (1992).

Total millable stalks per plot were counted between June 25 and September 15, 1997. Yields of metric tons of cane per hectare (TC/H) were calculated by multiplying stalk weights by number of stalks. Theoretical yields of metric tons of sugar per hectare (TS/H) were calculated by multiplying TC/H by KS/T and dividing by 1,000.

Analyses of variance were done using the procedures described by McIntosh (1983). F-ratios were chosen according to a mixed model, with treatments (clones) fixed and locations random. The source of variation that corresponded to the error term for the effect being tested was used to calculate the least significant difference (LSD). LSD was used regardless of significance of F- ratios in all analyses to protect against high type-II error rates, and significant differences were sought at the 10-percent probability level (Glaz and Dean 1988).

Analyses of clonal stability across locations were done by using the procedures recommended in Shukla (1972). For each clone, the stability-variance parameter of Shukla was subsequently used to calculate (at the 1-percent probability level) a stability-safety index as described by Eskridge (1990). The mean yield of the clone and the stability of the clone across locations influence the value of this stability-safety index. The higher the stability-safety index, the more likely the clone is to have high yields at all locations.

Before the clones were evaluated in stage IV, they were tested in separate tests by artificial inoculation for susceptibility to sugarcane smut, sugarcane mosaic virus, leaf scald, and RSD. Clones were inoculated in stage II plots to determine eye spot susceptibility. Since being advanced to stage IV, separate artificial-inoculation tests were repeated with pathogens of smut, RSD, mosaic, and leaf scald. Each clone was also rated for its reactions to natural infection by sugarcane smut, sugarcane rust, sugarcane mosaic virus, and leaf scald. The farm management at each location controlled sugarcane management practices, such as fertilization, cultivation, and pest control.

Two separate tests were conducted at Gainesville, Florida, to determine cold tolerance of clones from the CP 92 and CP 93 series. These tests were conducted at the Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences' Greenacre Agronomy Farm. The experiments were planted in randomized complete blocks with six replications. Plots were 1.5 m long and 2.1 m wide. A moderate freeze of -2 °C occurred on December 6, 1997, followed by a second freeze of -4 °C on December 7. Stalks were sampled for the analysis of sucrose content on December 18, 1997, and February 2, 1998. The cold-tolerance rating was based on the deterioration of juice quality after the freeze damage to mature sugarcane stalks.


previous page next page 

United States Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Research Service

The material on this page is in the public domain.

Original posting: April 19, 1999.

     
Last Modified: 02/06/2002
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House