Working With Nature To
Hydrologist Jonathan Angier
collects groundwater beneath
a Beltsville, Maryland, riparian
zone to analyze it for dissolved
The Chesapeake Bay is an aquatic wondera mixture of fresh and
salt water from the Atlantic Ocean. Beneath the surface, the variety
of species is evident in the oysters, blue crabs, and striped bass,
and the submerged plant life that makes up their habitat. However, the
environment above water has changed greatly over time. The 64,000-square-mile
Chesapeake Bay watershed, originally home to Native Americans and later
to the few English settlers who arrived in 1607, now has more than 15
million residents. It encompasses parts of Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania,
the District of Columbia, and New York State. Everyone who lives in
the watershed is just a few minutes from one of the more than 100,000
streams and rivers draining into the bay.
Since colonial times, much of the land surrounding the bay has been used for agriculture. In modern times, this has led to fertilizers and pesticides making their way into the Chesapeake Bay, where they alter the natural balance of flora and fauna. Excess nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, in its waters have led to outbreaks of bacteria, areas of greatly reduced aquatic biodiversity, and a decline in water quality.
Thanks, in part, to improved agricultural practices over the past 30 years, the Chesapeake Bay is recovering, but more must be done to restore its health. ARS researchers like soil scientist Gregory McCarty and his colleagues at the Environmental Quality Laboratory in Beltsville, Maryland, are looking at ways to reduce damage to the bay from agricultural sources and return the great body of water to its former glory.
To determine whether denitrification
is occurring at a riparian zone,
soil scientist Gregory McCarty
prepares to measure concentrations
of dissolved gases in water samples.
Specifically, the team is investigating the design and function of
riparian systems, which serve as buffer zones between bodies of water
and agricultural fields or urban areas. Riparian zones consist of grasses,
forest vegetation, and combinations of plants that slow runoff of contaminants
into surface waters and groundwater.
In most states, riparian systems of some sort are being used to improve water quality and provide wildlife habitats. They also help control flooding and sediment movement. But just which types and sizes are most effective? Much of the previous research on this subject has focused on just one or two aspects of a riparian ecosystem. But McCarty's work looks at a riparian system as a whole to see how different processes interact and affect the overall function of the ecosystem.
McCarty's research was conducted at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. It's part of a first-order agricultural watershed with a well-defined riparian zone in the Maryland coastal plain. A first-order watershed is an area of land that drains into a stream with no tributaries feeding it. The site was typical of farmland in the area.
Soil core taken from a
Beltsville, Maryland, riparian
zone at about 6 feet deep. The
dark matter represents the
bottom of the riparian soil
zone. The light-colored matter,
taken from a deeper depth, is
from the top of a water-
From the Field to the Stream
Nitrogen is mainly transported through groundwater, while phosphorus
is mostly carried by surface runoff. Vegetated riparian buffers are
often cited as areas where nitrogen and phosphorus can potentially be
removed. Riparian systems closest to the field are considered particularly
effective at nutrient removal. But, cautions McCarty, "The capacity
for riparian systems to slow down or reduce movement of agricultural
contaminants is highly variable, both by location within the watershed
and time of year. Climate, vegetation, topography, and hydrology exert
strong influences on riparian buffer function and behavior, and so affect
the contaminant-removing capabilities of a site."
Hydrologist Jonathan Angier, also of the Environmental Quality Laboratory, is studying the effect of hydrology, or water movement through a system, on the effectiveness of a buffer. Water moves not only across the land surface, but also vertically between the surface and the groundwater table. Movement across the soil surface can be decreased by plants and topography. Under the surface, water can move horizontally and vertically, making it more difficult to track and monitor and allowing it to bypass conditions that could potentially help remove contaminants.
Water also moves via first-order streams, the smallest streams in most water systems. Alongside these streams may be large holes, called macropores, which act as a bypass for groundwater, nutrients, and pesticides to travel from beneath the wetland soil directly into the stream.
"Macropores can be created by animals burrowing through the ground
or by water pressure," says Angier.
McCarty and Angier constructed sampling stations at five points along
a stream to monitor and compare individual stream segments. The segments
were each 300 meters (985 feet) long. The field site also included equipment
to measure groundwater levels and water pressure.
They found that in the upstream portion of the wetland, the water-saturated
conditions within the floodplain were caused by groundwater rising to
the surface, not by stream flooding. Generally, the faster the groundwater
reaches the surface, the more nitrogen it likely contains. "This
consequently influences how much nitrogen makes it to area streams,"
says Angierand ultimately to the larger ecosystem, in this case
the Chesapeake Bay.
Riparian buffers, even in their least effective portions, do remove significant portions of groundwater nitrate. But their overall efficacy is greatly influenced by hydrological conditions. Since some parts of the system may be more effective at nutrient removal than others, "A one-size-fits-all approach may not be sufficient to maximize the remediation potential of these systems," Angier says.
Where Nutrients Rest, Carbon Deposits
Riparian buffer zones have another benefit: They may allow more carbon
to be stored in the soil.
"Nutrient inputs into wetland systems can increase growth of riparian
vegetation, and this growth may represent a substantial increase in
carbon storage capacity," says McCarty. "Carbon, stored as
organic matter in the soil, makes the ecosystem more fertile and helps
the plants and soil microorganisms remove excess nutrients from the
Erosion and soil deposition associated with agricultural activity can
increase carbon storage within landscapes, including riparian buffers.
Testing of samples of deposited sediments in the riparian zone determined
that agricultural activity in the watershed has caused increased sediment
deposition to the wetland. "In the past 45 years or so, upland
sediment has become highly enriched in organic matter, indicating that
large amounts of organic carbon have been stored there," says McCarty.
"Rates of carbon sequestration in the wetland are much higher than
rates that occurred before agricultural activity began in this watershed."
McCarty concludes, "Our studies on a small agricultural watershed
indicate that sediment deposition makes the wetland more efficient for
As for the Chesapeake Bay, riparian systems seem to be able to alleviate
the major stresses on itexcess nutrients from agriculture, other
forms of water pollution, and changes in the landscape from development
and erosion. The challenge for future research will be to determine
the best design for these systems, taking into account the role that
water movement through the soil plays in their effectiveness.By
Agricultural Research Service Information Staff.
This research is part of Soil Resource Assessment and Management,
an ARS National Program (#202) described on the World Wide Web at http://www.nps.ars.usda.gov.
Gregory McCarty and
Jonathan Angier are with the USDA-ARS Environmental
Quality Laboratory, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Bldg. 007, Room 202, Beltsville,
MD 20705-2350; phone (301) 504-7401, fax (301) 504-5048.
|"Working With Nature To Keep the Chesapeake Healthy" was published in the October 2002 issue of Agricultural Research magazine.|